The Industrial Revolution and the Railroads
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The onset of the Industrial Revolution predated the emergence of the railroad by more than 100 years. Even so, the railroad did as much to enable the Industrial Revolution to maintain its momentum as any other single innovation of the 18th and 19th centuries. Mechanized technology was at the foundation of manufacturing and transportation alike, but the mechanization of transportation and shipping, especially with the addition of speed, was decisive in enabling manufacturing to achieve its own mechanized critical mass.To understand how an invention that postdated the onset of the Industrial Revolution became the key to industrial success, it is instructive to consider the status of industry prior to the revolutionary stage. In a curious way, the promise of the railroads for strengthening the force of multiple changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution is centered not in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries but rather as early as the ancient period. Roman sea power, combined with well-engineered roadways, were vital to its economic, military, and trade strength. Rome's reach extended northward up the boot of Italy and into the Continent, and as far as Britain (Vialls, 1982). With the decline of Rome maintenance of the transportation network declined, and stone paving for roads was appropriated for local building purposes. Thus transportation between settlements became difficult, and settlements became insular pockets of activity consistent with the emergence
. . .
Fremdling, 1977). That would help explain why stagecoaches were used to transport goods and passengers from the late 1850s through the 1860s and why the Pony Express began as late as 1860 (Fradkin, 2002).
Only after 1850 did more or less systematic development of infrastructure-scale U.S. railroads occur. Meanwhile, America's Industrial Revolution was proceeding apace. In 1834 Cyrus McCormick and Obed Hussey invented mechanized harvesters, which transformed agriculture much as interchangeable parts had transformed manufacture and steam had transformed locomotion. Cotton development in the South created demand for working livestock and farm products from the Northwest Territories (Howard, 1972; Moody, 1921). Yet rail construction was not exactly systematic. The whole matter was complicated by rival political and economic interests, although events and successful technology overtook them: "Opposed initially by the canal supporters, who were fearful of its competition, the rail industry by 1850 had brought a new dimension to U.S. life" (Wren, 2005, p. 83). That dimension was speed. By 1850 the fact that railroads would eclipse canals in shipping and transportation was inescapable.
Government subsidy facilitated (however tardily) ca
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Industrial Revolution, United States', Civil War, Accordingly McCallum, James Watt's, Morgan Moody, Fremdling Fogel's, Territories Howard, Erie Canal's, Erie Moody, industrial revolution, moody 1921, thompson 2005, howard 1972, civil war, rail lines, ed york, fremdling 1977, economic history, rail construction, howard 1972 75, library congress geography, w norton company, gies gies 1995, york w norton,
Approximate Word count = 2831
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
|