The Existence of God
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The spine of the ontological argument comes in Anselm's description of God as "whatever it is better to be than not to be." His point of departure is the attributes and qualities of that "whatever," plus grades of perfection more generally. Accordingly, God is first identified with whatever quality of existence or attribute of experience it is better to be than not to be. Further, any thing (or quality or attribute) that is characterized as "better" is, logically speaking, more perfect than a thing that it is being compared to. One artwork or piece of fruit or idea could be considered better than another. One idea may be better than all other ideas.Comparison of what is inferior to what is better in all aspects of experience, tied to a logical thought process and the employment of human reason in a systematic contemplation of ever-progressive perfection, is in the background of Anselm's proof of the existence of God. This is how the argument runs: If it is true that one thing can be thought of as better than another, does it not follow that there might be one thing that is better than many things? And if that is true, does it not follow that there might be one thing that is better than all things? If it is true that there is this one thing that is better and more perfect than all things, then it remains to identify that thing. Or, as Anselm prefers to suggest, it remains to contemplate the existence of that thing. It is in this way that one may arrive at the statement that
. . .
cal theologians make in Kant's opinion is in jumping from assigning a meaning to the notion of perfection and completeness and calling it God, to asserting something that is true about that meaning (that God necessarily exists). Just because human beings can conceive of the notion of absolute perfection does not prove that there exists any being of that category. Kant is saying that the advocates of the ontological proof of God's existence are skipping a step in their logic, which is to explore the content of the construction of a notion of unattainable completeness, perfection, or unconditionality: "It is precisely these conditions that we desire to know, in order that we may determine whether or not, in resorting to this concept, we are thinking anything at all" (Kant, p. 41).
Without knowing what that concept entails, it is logically incorrect to jump to the conclusion that a perfect being exists, or to conclude that it is impossible for the contemplation that such a being does not exist to overtake the first conclusion. Kant also rejects the arguments about God's necessary-existence-because-perfection by analogy, such as the idea that every triangle necessarily has three angles. He says that geometrical propositions are "synt
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
God Anselm, Kant Anselm, Accordingly God, Anselm Canterbury, God Kant, , existence god, human reason, true follow true, god necessarily exists, artifact human reason, artifact human, grades perfection, necessarily exists, exist existence, perfection god, imagine perfect, reason exists, perfect exists,
Approximate Word count = 1363
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The Existence of God
|