The House of Lords as a Judicial Body

In the background of Ensign is a growing body of case law aimed at ascertaining whether and to what extent corporate financial transactions undertaken with a view toward tax advantage ought to be permitted as a matter of equity in the shared burden of "supplies" required by the government to conduct its ordinary course of business. Blackstone locates the authority to levy taxes with the commons and, as a matter of equity, specifically rejects the idea that tax levies on the people should originate with the House of Lords because they are socially privileged, "supposed more liable to be influenced by the crown" (164). Even so, in the evolving British discourse of high-ticket tax-advantaged claims by corporate business entities, the issue of equity as fairness is implied rather than explicitly stated. The less explicit the statement, the more likely claims for privilege are to resonate in a culture.

Those who might deem equity a self-evident point of tax law would find instructive a pattern of tax-policy implementation in England until 1981 that tended to privileg

. . .
Finance Act. That was accomplished by the execution of 17 documents, constituting a composite transaction, on 14 July 1980. The key actions were that Ensign became a limited partner in the LP Victory Partnership (VP), contributing $2,375,000 of a total partnership capitalization of $3.25 million. This was meant to finance a film titled Escape to Victory to be filmed by Lorimar Productions Inc. (LPI), which had to that date spent more than $4 million on the picture and which had budgeted more than $12 million for the entire project. In exchange for the $3.25 inflow, LPI loaned VP the amount in excess of that inflow that would be required to complete the film, which would bring the cost of the film to $14 million. The loan was nonrecourse, meaning that the borrower was not obligated to repay it if the purpose for which the loan was made (producing the film) resulted in no income therefrom. Repayment terms were embedded in the revenue-sharing percentages agreed upon between VP and LPI regarding receipts on the film's distribution. In due course, VP sought tax relief on $14 million, the cost of production on Escape to Victory. Revenue denied it, and VP, or more exactly Ensign, the major cash contributor to the $3.25 million, appealed
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Finance Act, Burmah Burmah, Ramsay Burmah, House Lords, VP LPI, Inland Revenue, Lord Tomlin, Burmah Ramsay, Inc LPI, Revenue Commissioners, inland revenue, inland revenue commissioners, revenue commissioners, finance act, ramsay burmah, tax liability, taxpayer company, tax relief, house lords, film industry, film production, finance act 1971, british film industry, co ltd 1981, ramsay ltd inland,
Approximate Word count = 2982
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)

More Essays on The House of Lords as a Judicial Body