| |
| |
General Motors Response to Economic Challenges |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |

For over a generation, General Motors Corporation (GM) was the largest American business enterprise, and nearly a symbol of the American industrial economy. Yet, by the 1980s, the company was near to collapse. The immediate cause of GM's difficulties was competition from Japanese imports, but the more fundamental cause was arguably GM's difficulty in making the most efficient use of capital and labor. Thus, the experience of GM in deploying its capital and labor is a useful illustration of some fundamental issues facing all firms in a competitive environment. The following pages will examine the challenges facing GM since the 1970s, and its response to those challenges. Automobile manufacture is the capital-intensive, assembly-line industrial process par excellence. The story of Henry Ford and the assembly line is a familiar piece of folklore. The "line," as we usually visualize it, is in fact only the last of five basic stages in the production of automobiles; these stages are summarized in Figure 1 (taken from National Academy, 1982, p. 21, Figure 2.1). This complex industrial process requires a combination of enormous capital investment and a highly specialized work force. The former is straightforward; an automobile assembly line is a large, complex, and highly specialized machine, not readily adaptable to any other purpose (beyond turning out some slightly different model of automobile). The same is true of all the other production stages save perhaps the first
Related Essays
General Motors Saturn in Japan .... be to set forth the economic context and .... General Motors was developing its response: the Saturn .... General Motors, Saturn's parent company, appears to have made a .... (1311 5 )
Economy in the 1980s .... General Motors eliminated some competition by buying up partsmakers .... As can be seen from the response of many .... responds to market pressures and economic shifts by .... (1581 6 )
Profile of Chrysler Corporation .... based in South America, Chrysler Motors de Venezuela .... manufacturers in cutting costs in response to the .... influences and is influenced by general social, economic .... (4548 18 )
Impact of Japanese Cars Japanese Cars and American Decline .... can be learned about the response of long .... bent on domination, though now through economic rather than .... With the "Saturn," General Motors launched an entirely new .... (4819 19 )
Automobile Trade Dispute Between US & Japan .... revolt was as much cultural as purely economic. .... they accounted for some five percent (General Motors, 1974, p .... was strikingly defensive in its response to the .... (3305 13 )

European small-car imports in the late 1950s had been turned back. GM executives assumed that the future would be much like the past. But beginning in the late 1960s, GM and the other domestic carmakers faced a new challenge, from Japan, and by the middle 1970s, it was clear that the domestic industry was losing. The Japanese, it appeared, could make better and more popular cars, and make them less expensively.
Comparative analysis of the utilization of capital and labor by the domestic industry and the Japanese identifies some of the factors that contributed to the Japanese inroads. In 1982, near the low point of GM's and other domestic manufacturers' fortunes relative to the Japanese carmakers, a panel of experts at the National Academy of Engineers evaluated the components of the productivity differential between Japanese and American labor in automobile production. The components considered were process yield, labor absenteeism, job structure, process automation, quality systems, product design, and work pace (National Academy, 1989, p. 102, Table 6.5).
Most of these components are fairly self-explanatory, but some require further explication. Process yield is a measure of the direct efficiency of the line producti
Category: Economics - G
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
National Academy, Automobile Workers, GM A-Car, Corporation GM, Alan Smith, GM American, Components Bearings, Japanese American, Henry Ford, Sectors Raw, national academy, process yield, job structure, assembly line, capital labor, production process, productivity differential, national academy 1982, sherman 1994, product design, domestic industry, academy 1982 21, 1989 102 table, academy 1989 102, 21 figure 21,
= 1651
= 7 (250 words per page)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
Click Here
to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
|
Debbie B. |
| |
|
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
|
Mike F. |
| |
|
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
|
Carla T. |
| |
|
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
|
Nate A. |
| |
|
"I love this site!!!"
|
Marie H. |
| |
|
| |
|
|