Edward Said's Orientalism

That the East (and its opposite, West) are in this context almost instantly recognizable is itself a demonstration in microcosm of Said's central proposition. The only ambiguities, for the American reader, are whether the terms refer to internal American geography, or perhaps to "West" and "East" in the Cold War sense. Once these alternatives are disposed of the reader knows at once that what is intended is a distinction between a cultural "West," incorporating Europe and North America, and a cultural "East" extending from the Arab world (part of which, Morocco, is actually farther west than any part of Europe) on to China and Japan. In short, the West and East of which Kipling said "never the twain shall meet."

More specifically, Said is writing about Western conventions in dealing with the Arab and Islamic worlds, the "Middle East" in conventional American usage. Said observes that to Americans, Orient refers primarily to East Asia, mainly China and Japan (1978, p. 1), but Orientalism, devoted primarily to the Arab-Islamic world, secondarily to India, and only least to the Far East, is a long-standing usage in the Western intellec

. . .
rk today, poisoning public and private, popular and academic attitudes in ways which Said documents at length" (1979). The "anthology of overbearing observations, analyses, and 'explanations' of non-European cultures ... makes for painful reading" (1979). In fact, the Western reader will find much to be embarrassed about, or worse, in Said's pages. The most damning critique of Said's book simply as a book, and one substantially borne out by reading it, is in Plumb's New York Times Book Review piece. "It is a pity that [Said's book] is so pretentiously written, so drenched in jargon" (1979). In fact, by Page 3 of the text, Said tells us that he is employing "Michel Foucault's notion of a discourse," without ever telling us just what this notion is (1978). Foucault and discourse theory are prominent in contemporary literary studies, and have spread to other disciplines as well. However, the educated but nonspecialist public is likely to be hazy at best on these concepts, and in general much of the book has a turgid style conforming all too well to the negative stereotype of literary theory. Fortunately, as Plumb also notes, Said often departs from this style: "When Mr. Said is doing a hatchet job ... he is a different wri
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Islamists Islamic, Hoeber Rudolph, TM Greene, Palestine Western, Earlier Arab, Political Islam, Fortunately Plumb, Library Journal, Book Review, Indeed Conrad, book review, roy 1994, said's book, review book, reprinted book review, york wilson, 1979 1980, review digest, reprinted book, pp 1105-6, 1980 pp, 1979 1980 pp, book review digest, digest 1979 1980, 1980 pp 1105-6,
Approximate Word count = 2304
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Edward Said Orientalism