Development of Slavery in the Northeastern Colonies
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The development of slavery in the northeastern colonies of the United States had its origins in the general slave trade of the world. The European slave trade so essential to crops such as sugarcane in British and French colonies abroad was transported to American soil with the colonization of the original British holdings in America. It was not until cotton became such a cash crop in the southernmost colonies, however, that the slave trade became so fully entrenched in the entire economic well being of what were to become the United States of America. Slavery, as it evolved in the United States, became largely a southern "problem," because it came to bolster the interests of the cotton planters of the South to a far greater extent than it supported a northern, more urban economy based on manufacturing. The northern colonies were actively trading in slaves in eighteenth century New England. Newport, Rhode Island, was a principal port of entry. From the period 1672 to 1760, slave trade in the northern colonies rose steadily, despite the objections of some colonial governors. In fact, colonial legislatures imposed duties on slave importations, but royal instructions (in 1731) forbade governors consenting to such acts. The action of S.C., 1760, in prohibiting the slave trade entirely was disallowed by the King Council. After 1690, slave importation mounted sharply. The northeastern part of the United States saw numerous slave plots and insurrections during the period
. . .
lantership begins with the admonishment, "In the first place, then, as it is in the interest of every planter to preserve his negroes in health and strength; so every act of cruelty is not less repugnant to the master's real profit, than it is contrary to the laws of humanity." The above passage (from the second edition of the Britannica, 1778-1783) is significant because it shows that the founding fathers and colonial governors were at least exposed to a more enlightened European influence with regard to slave ownership. The fact that they may have done away with slavery for political reasons or lack of a significant personal economic interest hardly diminishes the fact that slavery was unacceptable in the North far earlier than it was in the South. It could also be argued, as has been shown by the lengthy passage from Fogel's study, that the early colonists who settled in the North gave up a considerable economic interest by cutting all ties to the Crown, while at the same time denouncing slavery.
The extinction of slavery in the North followed the pattern (in order of states making it illegal): Pennsylvania (1780); Connecticut and Rhode Island (1784); New York (1785); and New Jersey (1786). As Morris recounts, "By judici
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
West Indies, John Jay, American Revolution, York City, North South, City February, South North, Irish Southern, Rhode Island, King Council, slave trade, north south, slave ownership, founding fathers, cotton gin, john jay, slavery north, york city, south north, institution slavery, slaves john jay, invention cotton gin, treasury encyclopedia britannica, cotton gin cotton, cotton cash crop,
Approximate Word count = 2515
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Development of Slavery in the Northeastern Colonies
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
