Charles Ray Retrospective
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The Charles Ray retrospective at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles is, at first glance, very simple. The viewer sees a number of works that seem to have very little to them: some mannequins, a painted wrecked car, a solid black cube, a table with a few ordinary objects on it. But hardly any of these objects turn out to be what they seem. Slower, more careful consideration of each of Ray's pieces rewards the viewer as twists and misdirections are revealed, as connections with the art of the past are evoked, and as the viewer comes to see meanings that were not apparent at first glance. Overall the Ray exhibition is a thoroughly challenging collection of works that invite the viewer to think about the course art has taken in the postmodern era. Ray's art exerts no traditional appeal to the senses in terms of beauty of form, line, or color. In fact, the mundane nature of most of the objects in the exhibit tends to repel the viewer's interest. Pieces such as his 1990 Self-Portrait or the 1988 Tabletop would not raise any interest in most settings. Ultimately this is very important because any initial interest the viewer feels in them is entirely due to their presence in a museum and their presentation as art. In any other setting Ray's process of replacing the mannequin's head with his portrait and dressing it in his favorite clothes would be unnoticed, and the turning objects on the Tabletop would be easily ignored. Thus, it soon becomes clear that Ray's
. . .
he mannequin stand is placed directly on the floor.
If Self-Portrait were to be seen in isolation the clothing is bland enough and face sufficiently generalized so that nothing but the title would tell the viewer that this was a portrait of a specific person. Once the viewer knows that it is Ray himself, however, this leads to more careful consideration of the face and it becomes clear that this is not the relatively abstract sketch of human features featured on standard mannequins. By forcing the viewer's attention to the features the artist also draws attention to the hair, glasses, and clothes. These are very ordinary things but, as the viewer's consideration of the piece continues, it becomes clear that Ray must have chosen them because they were essential to the self-portrait he was creating. This, in turn, comments on some essential questions about portraiture. Like thousands of portraits from earlier centuries, the image of this particular individual has, at best, only a limited amount of meaning for viewers who do not know the man. Yet artists expended great effort on creating likenesses of sitters that probed their psychology, were beautiful in aesthetic terms, and sought to present more than a mere image. These
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Family Romance, Overall Ray, Venus Fall, Los Angeles, Charles Ray, family romance, careful consideration, sculpture comments, directly floor, piece measures, ray's art, ordinary objects, human features, mundane objects, fall '91,
Approximate Word count = 1522
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
|