Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

The Regular Education Initiative (REI)

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The Regular Education Initiative (REI), first formally introduced in 1986 by former Assistant Secretary of Education, Madeleine C. Will, called for general educators to become more responsible for the education of students who have special needs in school. Mainstreaming, the practice of placing students with disabilities into regular education classrooms, has been accepted for some time; nevertheless, however, Will lent official sanction to the notion that regular education should take over even more of the functions traditionally thought the province of special education. In essence, she questioned the legitimacy of special education as a system of education distinct from general education.

The REI, as articulated by Will, was vague with regard to how much regular education should assume responsibility for the education of students with disabilities. In fact, that vagueness has contributed to the current debate in the 1990s over the roles of special versus regular education in educational programming for students with disabilities. Today, views on the inclusion of students with disabilities range from full inclusion--the belief that all students with disabilities should be educated solely in the regular classroom--to the belief in the maintenance of a full range of service delivery options (the continuum of services option), including residential institutions, special schools, special classes, resource rooms, and regular classes.

The differences between mainstreaming

. . .
om a special education teacher in that general, or regular, classroom. Fuchs and Fuchs (1994) note that the above approach to placing the special student with general students for the entirety of the school day (with some attendance by a special education teacher) is still not good enough for inclusionists. As the authors indicate, "Whereas the signature phrase of REI [Regular Education Initiative] was 'cooperation between special and general education,' the full-inclusionist mantra is "eliminate special education'" (p. 307). Fuchs and Fuchs (1994) reiterate that the inclusionist leadership would like to see an end to the continuum of services primarily because it precludes desirable socialization experiences for students with severe intellectual disabilities (p. 307). In the inclusionists' view, if the special education apparatus is to be effectively salvaged, it must be dismantled and merged with general education. As Altman and Kanagawa (1994) assert, "this position frequently entails the literal restructuring of schools through the merger of special and general education" (p. 184). Inclusionists believe that the isolating and dehumanizing aspects brought about by the segregation of special education are unconscionable; t
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Nolet Tindal, Fuchs Fuchs, Education Madeleine, Hallahan Kauffman, McIntosh Vaughn's, Northern Iowa, Public Law, McIntosh Vaughn, Burrello Lashley, Wisniewski Alper, special education, students disabilities, education teacher, special education teacher, middle school, regular education, special education teachers, school day, proponents inclusion, education teachers, fuchs 1994, fuchs fuchs, fuchs fuchs 1994, nolet tindal 1994, school science classes,
Approximate Word count = 2925
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)

More Essays on The Regular Education Initiative (REI)

Mainstreaming 5729 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW