Ilongot Headhunting
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This study will examine Renato Rosaldo's Ilongot Headhunting, 1883-1974, focusing on Rosaldo's point of view on the subject and the role of that perspective on the material in the book. The study will argue that Rosaldo's sympathetic attitude toward the people in his research affects the work in positive ways. Ethnographic research carried out over a lengthy period of time inevitably includes biases on the part of any author. The question is not whether there is a bias, but whether the author is aware of that bias and remains conscious of it in order to try to keep it from distorting that research or the findings, Rosaldo is aware of his sympathy for the people, and, in fact, immediately acknowledges it in the first words of the book: I am most indebted to my Ilongot friends and companions whose names (pseudonyms, for obvious reasons) appear in this book. It has been a pleasure to recollect our conversations and days of walking together along the trails (v). The debate in ethnographical studies continues over researcher bias. It is the opinion here that the ethnographer should be personally involved in his subjects' lives in order to not only deepen his research but also to prevent their becoming mere statistics for objective analysis. Rosaldo makes the important point that only by seeing the subjects in a particular study as unique can the ethnographer come to a meaningful and effective conclusion with respect to which methods and concepts should be used in that specifi
. . .
illusion created by the preeminent methods of anthropological research" (1).
One way Rosaldo avoids traditional Western-oriented biases is to take the Ilongots on their own terms, to assess their society according to that society's realities: "The scope of my project thus definitively moved beyond social structure to encompass the distinctive ways in which Ilongot conduct is culturally patterned, institutionally grounded, and historically produced" (19).
Rosaldo also allows the Ilongots to speak for themselves in narrative form. Traditional ethnographers might protest that such a methodology might sidestep some of the biases of the Western ethnographer, but it also introduces the biases of the Ilongots themselves. In other words, why should the ethnographer take these people at their word? What ensures that what they are telling Rosaldo is true? However, Rosaldo does not take the narratives at face value as accurate or comprehensive portraits of Ilongot life and reality. Instead, he considers the narratives in the context of his own observations and non-narrative research. Also, the author argues that "ethnographers should attend carefully to compositional [narrative] modes, for what we have to say is rarely separable from how
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
William Jones, Ilongot Headhunting, Ilongots Headhunting, Accordingly Rosaldo, Ilongots Western, ilongot life, University Press, martial law, ilongot society, study ilongots, headhunting ilongots, , ilongot headhunting 1883-1974, accord socially, social structure, ilongots themselves, socially plans, ilongot reality, accord socially plans, western standards behavior,
Approximate Word count = 1443
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
|