Aristotle & Kenneth Burke on Rhetoric

To Aristotle, language and the use of language in effective speech can bring human beings nearer and nearer their higher purpose, which is happiness as that ideal, but for Burke words and their use are much more problematic. Words for Burke are much more mysterious and playful entities than for Aristotle. For Aristotle, the broad class of the audience is what is foremost, while with Burke the reader suspects that Burke is enjoying himself far too much in his search to truly expect to arrive at the kind of full-scale rhetorical scheme which Aristotle seeks.

As Richard McKeon writes in his Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric,

Rhetoric is closely allied to logic, for it is the counterpart of dialectic, in Aristotle's analysis. . . It has a moral and political dimension, and the Sophists, as Aristotle views their practices, confused it with the art of politics. . . . It is finally a verbal art. . . . (Aristotle 620).

Aristotle believes that the art of rhetoric is an art of persuasion which is itself based on reason. However, the reason upon which it is based is the reason of the rhetorician, not the n

. . .
d analysis is meant to help a man who wants to teach the audience or to persuade it. This reader believes that, for all of Aristotle's high-mindedness about character and reason on the part of the speaker, the audience is essentially treated like a bundle of reflexes and reactions by the speaker. Certainly Aristotle in his scientific pursuits sought to speak as truly and clearly as possible, but rhetoric, as Aristotle notes, is an art and not a science. The speaker following Aristotle's lead will not be trying to teach the audience to think for themselves or to come to know the details of the art of rhetoric. To the contrary, the speaker will not want to audience to be aware of those details or that art at all. If the audience were aware, it might arm itself against the rhetorical tools of the speaker. The speaker seeks not to educate or awaken the people in the audience; he seeks to persuade them. Aristotle does differentiate between the messages of a good man (such as himself) and the messages of a bad man (such as the Sophists), but as far as techniques of persuasion and manipulation go, all speakers employ the same means. Moving to Kenneth Burke, the reader finds a man who is far more open to the reader than is Aristotle,
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
McKeon Aristotle, Aristotle Burke, Kenneth Burke, Sophists Aristotle, Motives Burke, Permanence Change, Aristotle Aristotle, Burke Grammar, Malcolm Cowley, Rhetoric Rhetoric, based reason, speaker audience, kenneth burke, rhetoric burke, proof apparent proof, burke reader, aristotle 620, reason speaker, mode modes, apparent proof, proof apparent, logic study words, reason speaker audience,
Approximate Word count = 1578
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Aristotle & Kenneth Burke on Rhetoric