Activities of the IMF
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank managed to draw criticism from the political, left, right and center for their activities and policies. Interestingly enough, the left and right agree on their distaste for some of these policies, although for different reasons. The right worries about measures the IMF institutes as inherently anti-growth, while the left complains that the IMF measures are destructive to the local populations.During the past year, the IMF has both expressed a new, expanded understanding of its role in the world economy and been involved in attempting to stave off economic collapse throughout Asia. In the following pages, the focus is on exploring some of the more recent criticisms of the IMF, from several different perspectives. According to conservative, free-market Republicans, the IMF is wrong to provide the Asian bankers and multinationals with bailouts. There are differences between the various stances. For example, Pat Buchanan opposed the bailout because it cost the U.S. taxpayers, which he believed was inevitable with free trade. He also noted that the bailout protected bankers and portfolio managers unjustifiably. They were allowed to take their gains, so they should also have to deal with their losses (Piling on the bailout, 1998). Many other conservatives, including Jack Kemp, oppose bailouts because they are connected to IMF policies which conservatives believe are inherently an
. . .
ard a more regulated and restrictive economy (Forbes, 1996). On the other hand, liberals criticize the IMF's tendency to impose austerity measures that place the heaviest burden on the poorest people. They note that the IMF is more concerned with creating measures that protect banks and other large institutions than they are in ensuring the well-being of the mass of the population. Indeed, it is the large institutions that the IMF is focused on, and it is true that the population feels the impact of the austerity measures in ways that the financial institutions do not.
For example, David Corn (1998) quoted Walden Bello as noting that Korea has what they call "IMF suicides", in which laid-off workers kill themselves and their families. Bello noted that the IMF lies when it says that it works with public organizations and economists in the countries it works with. He explained that the IMF works solely with governments and their bureaucrats and that the IMF policies mean increases in joblessness, homelessness, and hunger for the masses of people.
In Congress, opposition also focused on the human rights records of some of the countries, including Indonesia, which obtained funding from the IMF. Representative Bernie Sanders no
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Owen Ullmann, Wall Street, IMF Executive, EJ Dionne, Ravich Bandow, Austerity Measures, Support Bailouts, World Bank, Bank IMF, Walden Bello, austerity measures, 1998 noted, noted imf, global economy, bandow 1998, corn 1998, ravich bandow, ravich bandow 1998, holloway 1998, imf failed, financial institutions, piling bailout 1998, 1998 noted imf, international monetary fund, imf world bank,
Approximate Word count = 2518
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Activities of the IMF
|