Assessments of American Foreign Policy

CONFLICTING APPROACHES TO THE APPLICATION OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY

In the 1940s and 1950s, George Frost Kennan, Reinhold Niebuhr, and William Appleman Williams presented differing assessments of the effectiveness of American foreign policy as it was applied, as well as differing contentions as to how it should be applied. The thought of these three individualspolitical theorist and policy maker in the case of Kennan, philosopher and theologian in the case of Niebuhr, and historian and insightful critic of the American political experience in the case of Williams, as that thought is relevant to the development and application of American foreign policy, is reviewed and critiqued in this paper.

The review and critique of the thought Kennan, Niebuhr, and Williams are based largely on three worksAmerican Diplomacy by Kennan, The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness by Niebuhr, and The Tragedy of American Diplomacy by Williams. With respect to each of these three men, however, the review and critique of their thought demand consideration of some of their other works. Thus, additional works by each of the three men are cited as appropriate to accurately define and assess their thought.

While a great deal of chronological overlap existed in the professional lives of Kennan, Niebuhr, and Williams, Niebuhr's earliest work predated that of Kennan and Kennan's earliest work predated that of Williams. Thus, the review and critique in this paper begins with Niebuhr's

Related Essays

American Foreign Policies .... George Frost Kennan, Reinhold Niebuhr, and William Appleman Williams presented differing assessments of the effectiveness of American foreign policy as it was .... (6328 25 )

Conflicting Approaches to American Foreign Policy .... George Frost Kennan, Reinhold Niebuhr, and William Appleman Williams presented differing assessments of the effectiveness of American foreign policy as it was .... (3851 15 )

HUNGARY: MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICY ISSUES Intr .... recently defeated Western oriented government and the assessments of American and other .... the more profitable state owned enterprises to foreign interests at .... (2459 10 )

US Middle East Policy The revision of this paper required 10 ne .... the support of the American general public and America's allies for American foreign policy toward the Middle East. I think that my assessments validated this .... (8406 34 )

Current Problems in the US .... certainly shuffled up these wrongheaded assessments. .... The renewed anti-American vitriol overseas has .... Bush Administration's brash foreign policy, its willingness .... (829 3 )

lic of China.19 He wanted to counter communism, but he also wanted to avoid the ultimate war.20 Niebuhr proclaimed that he objected to the American penchant to dismiss as irrelevant and unimportant the positions and opinions of other nations when such positions and opinions differed from those of the United States.21 In his writings, however, he often displayed an ethnocentric perspective of his own. He contended, as an example, that "the world is being held together" by American power.22 In another instance, Niebuhr was able to equate the Soviet suppression of the Hungarian uprising in 1956 with the AngloFrench attach on Egypt over control of the Suez Canal, but, at the same time, was either unable or unwilling to recognize the similarity of the American position in Panama.23 Niebuhr was able to state that "the chief moral and political problem with which we have to contend is derived from the fact that we have a strong antiimperialist tradition and yet we are an imperial power . . .," but he did not feel compelled to specify American imperialism as he did in the instance of that of other nations.24 In yet another instance, he was able to 19Harland, 200201. 20Reinhold Niebuhr, "The Two Dimensions of the Stru

Category: Government - A