Crisis in Iran & American Foreign Policy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Protests by Islamic fundamentalists in Iran erupted into violence in 1978. The government of the Shah declared martial law in 12 major cities in early September of that year, and a military government for the country was appointed two months later. The Shah was forced to flee the country in January 1979, and the opposition leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, returned to Iran in earlyFebruary of that year. Iran was declared an Islamic Republic on 1 April 1979.The events that occurred in Iran in 1978 and 1979 demanded a complete reappraisal of American foreign policy for the Middle East. Under the Shah, Iran had formed one of the cornerstones of American policy in the region. Open warfare broke out between Iran and Iraq in September 1980, and that conflict caused more shifts in American foreign policy toward the Middle East. The continuing ArabIsraeli dispute, an enduring and deepening American dependence on Middle Eastern energy sources, and a growing concern with international political terrorism, much of which originated in Middle Eastern countries further complicated to development and application of American foreign policy in the Middle East. On 2 August 1990, Iraq invaded the State of Kuwait. This date proved to be another watershed in American foreign policy development in the Middle East. To many observers, American foreign policy toward the Middle East in the period between the proclaiming of an Islamic republic in Iran in 1979 and Iraq's invasion of Kuwai
. . .
esence of Palestinians became a reality in Lebanon, the Phalangists relied every more heavily on their independent militia (Deeb, 1980).
2. The National Liberal Party. The National Liberals were the chief allies of the Phalangists in the Lebanese Front (Deeb, 1980). Where the Phalange attracted lower and middle class Christians, the National Liberals attracted upper class Christians (Rabinovich, 1985). The National Liberals supported, to an extent, a form of Arab nationalism. Their preference was for the conservative, monarchist type of regimes found in Jordan and Iraq (Rabinovich, 1985). The Baathist coup in Iraq was truly frightening to the National Liberals. The fall of the monarchist government in Iraq quelled PanArab support of any kind among the National Liberals (Rabinovich, 1985).
3. The Suleiman Faranjiyya Camp. The Suleiman Camp was centered in the Zugharta region of the country, and they have always been willing to resort to violence to promote or protect their positions (Ma'luf, Farhat, 1972). The camp had a longstanding feud with Lebanon's Sunnis. The camp, however, had a strong relationship with Syria (Iyad, 1978). The camp formed its own militia in 1969, following a conflict with Palestinian organizati
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Middle East, Information Administration, United Nations, Lebanese Army, Palestinians Lebanon, Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin, IranIraq War, Iraq Sick, Bush Administration, middle east, palestinian resistance, foreign policy, resistance organizations, rabinovich 1985, palestinian resistance organizations, palestinians lebanon, west bank, american foreign policy, american foreign, policy middle east, policy middle, green 1988, foreign policy middle, status quo coalition,
Approximate Word count = 9640
Approximate Pages = 39 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Crisis in Iran & American Foreign Policy
|