Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Analysis of an Argument by Activist Ralph Nader

This is an excerpt from the paper...

This paper is a critical analysis of Ralph Nader's article, "Nader's Nineties: How to Put the Punch Back in Politics," following the structure of M. Neil Browne and Stuart M. Keeley's book, Asking the Right Questions. Nader, one of the best know activists in America, is critical of the ability of consumer advocates to keep pace with the corporate capitalists they are fighting against. His article proposes a prescriptive remedy for what he sees as a dire political vacuum. This paper considers whether or not he has made a solid case for his argument and proposed workable solutions. Although Nader is a powerful, passionate force himself, his logic is not always sound nor his conclusions always complete. This paper examines the weaknesses of his writing and suggests ways in which he could build a better case.

Nader's article was originally written by the radical magazine, Mother Jones, whose readership consists largely of like-minded individuals sharing his passion, if not his willingness to work. He therefore begins by assuming that his readers share his indignation with the way the world has become, a nation of consumers subservient to corporate power. The issue, that such a system is bad, is prescriptive, and the conclusion he wishes his readers to reach is that this system should be combated using the most sophisticated tools at hand, rather than "the political equivalent of picks and hoes" (Nader, 1996, p. 1).

He offers a number of reasons in support of his argume

. . .
7). That this world is not the way he believes it should be is the primary issue of his argument. He sees a world filled with corporate greed and the consumption of goods, instead of the world he would prescribe: a place controlled by individual citizens in which quality of life overrides the accumulation of possessions. Nader's reasoning contains a number of fallacies. One example of a fallacy of equivocation is in his use of the word "right." In his usage, a right is anything he argues should be given freely to all citizens: "the right to vote, the right to speak, the right to homestead 160 acres of farmland" (Nader, 1996, p. 5). Good liberal that he is, Nader contends that these are all rights, but some could argue that homesteading "rights" are in fact privileges, available when sufficient land is free to offer to those interested in homesteading, not simply something that ought, "by rights," to be given to all. Interestingly, in an article that purports to oppose most authority as being too big, greedy, and inhuman, Nader also resorts to the fallacy of appealing to authorities. His broadest such appeal is in his use throughout of unattributed quotes, facts that, while they criticize big business, appear to do so fro
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Mother Jones, Justice Department, Federal Reserve, Questions Nader, Ralph Nader, nader 1996, Hall Nader, Browne Keeley, , 1996 1, Ralph Nader's, Punch Politics, nader 1996 1, 1996 1 offers, evidence support, unattributed quotes, quality life, justice department, regain control, 1 offers, nineties punch politics, nader's nineties punch, own authority, value assumptions,
Approximate Word count = 1561
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$