Structure of Work in the American Economy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The structure of work in the American economy is in a period of transition as the 1990s approach. Externally, both international and domestic pressures demand increased productivity from organizations. Internally, employees demand greater participation in the organizational decisions which affect their lives. One of the factors which is involved in each of these pressure areas is the scheduling or organizational work time for employees. Several different alternatives to the standard 40hour per week, eighthour per day work week have been suggested, and, on limited scales, implemented. Among these alternatives are job sharing, flextime, and the fourday work week. The research study proposed will examine the fourday work week alternative.In the 1990s, organizations must develop structures and systems which will permit them to integrate often conflicting demands. One set of often conflicting demands pits employee pressures for changes in the standard 40hour per week, eighthour per day work week against demands for increased productivity. A change in the standard work week need not lead to productivity reductions. The effect of such a change on productivity will depend largely on the structure of the new system, and how well the characteristics of the new system meshes with organizational requirements. An ill considered, hasty change, however, could potentially cause a serious deterioration in productivity. On the other han
. . .
ld cause an organization to tend to either overlook or to downplay the lower order needs (which include compensation in a modern industrial society). Acceptance of the Herzberg theory would cause an organization to continue to address needs such as compensation, without, however, placing a primary motivational emphasis on them.
The Application of Power in Organizations
Power is a concept with which organizational behaviorists have long been concerned (McDermott, 1985). The use of power within organizations is most often perceived as a practice employed by one individual to overcome the resistance of another, as a means of attaining an organizational goal (Pfeffer, 1981). In the context of this perception, power differences are thought to create problems within organizations, because such power differences lead to the development of organizational conflicts (Tjosvold, 1985).
7
Conflicts are typically thought to be essential, as a means of providing a setting where power many be employed (Lawrence, and Lorsch, 1986). This assumption is, to a degree, paradoxical, in that power differences are also thought to be one cause of organizational conflict. Nevertheless, the typical train of thought is that the use of pow
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
ParisiCarew Blanchard, Maslow Herzberg, , Salancik Pfeffer, Definition Terms, Organizations Power, Lawrence Lorsch, REVIEW LITERATURE, Statement Purpose, Acceptance Maslow, organizational conflict, power organizations, fourday week, research study, development organizational, hardy 1985, proposed research study, standard week, proposed research, unobtrusive power, application power, development organizational conflict, application power organizations, lead development organizational, training development journal,
Approximate Word count = 2734
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Structure of Work in the American Economy
|