International Accounting Standards Committee
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The International Accounting Standards Committee was formed in 1972, in an effort to standardize accounting procedures amongst the international investment community (Feldman & Herbert, 1977). The widespread adaptation of IASC standards is dependent upon the pressure applied by the large international financial institutions, stock exchanges, and accounting firms (Cummings, 1974). The overall objectives of the IASC are to ensure that accounting standards in each member country conform to IASC set standards (Slipkowsky, 1986). Independent auditors are available to satisfy the authenticity of these financial standards. Noncompliance in reference to IASC standards are noted in issued audit reports (Feldman & Herbert, 1977).The IASC is comprised of two members from each of the founding nine countries. Also included are twenty six associate members (Feldman & Herbert, 1977). The Steering Committee includes a financial analyst from the United States and representatives of the accountancy bodies in France, India and the UK. The International Chamber of Commerce is also represented on the steering committee (Management Accounting-London, 1994). Progress in the first years included the appointment of seven steering committees, disclosure of general accounting policies, presentation and valuation of inventories, consolidated financial statements, basic disclosure of financial statements and financial reporting under inflationary conditions (Cummings, 1974
. . .
ard 14(IAS) be revised. The new standard should provide clearer and more effective guidance for defining industry and geographic segments and for identifying and measuring such items as segment revenue, segment expenses, segment result and segment assets (Management Accounting-London, 1994).
In February of 1995 the IASC published exposure draft E49. The draft requires recognition of all deferred tax liabilities. in addition all deferred tax assets must be recognized in financial statements if it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which the deferred tax assets can be used (Baliga, 1995). Consistent with IASC standards, E49 seeks to eliminate from IAS12, an earlier exposure draft, the partial provision approach used in the UK and the deferral method used in Canada. E49 replaces these methods with a single accounting treatment for deferred tax: full provision using the liability method. This method envisages accounting for deferred tax on revaluations where there is no change in the asset's tax basis and the revaluations would enter into the calculation or profit in a later period on realization. The draft also delineates the temporary differences between IAS12 and E49. Also detailed are exempti
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
IASC IASC, Expected Future, Management Accounting-London, United Nations, Feldman Herbert, E40 Significant, Recognized Authority, Europe IASC, Canada E49, European Community, accounting standards, international accounting, international accounting standards, deferred tax, exposure draft, 1994 iasc, iasc standards, standards committee, accounting standards committee, steering committee, feldman herbert, deferred tax assets, feldman herbert 1977, fair value, accounting standards board,
Approximate Word count = 1722
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on International Accounting Standards Committee
|