Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Call of the Wild & The Incredible Journey

This is an excerpt from the paper...

This study will provide a comparative analysis of Jack London's The Call of the Wild and Sheila Burnford's The Incredible Journey. The study will emphasize the differences between the two novels with respect to the audiences and purposes for which the authors are writing. Although both works are about animals, Burnford's story is typical of much children's literature in that it is carefully designed to make her child readers "better" in both a personal and social sense (braver, more loving, better citizens, etc.), while London's tale is meant to challenge his adult readers with respect to their perception and experience of human reality.

Burnford herself said that The Incredible Journey was "not intended . . . as a book for children," although it was the recipient of the Canadian Children's Book of the Year award for 1961 (Stott, 1984, p. 60). As Isabelle Jan writes in On Children's Literature, the history of stories for children about animals is littered with works which are too sentimental and anthropomorphic (Jan, 1974, p. 81), and Burnford's own book has been criticized for showing those very shortcomings (Stott, 1984, p. 60). Jan writes that "Animal fables for children have a long history which starts with Roman de Renart and the Fables of La Fontaine." Those works, highly original and challenging to their readers' imaginations, are contrasted by Jan with such works as "the dreary, labored caricature in the manner of Benjamin Rabier or the Contes de mon pere le Jars by

. . .
as spent writing, pursuing travel and politics, buying land, and fighting debt. In failing health at the end of his life, he became disillusioned with humanity, claiming to write only to add to his estate. He published The Call of the Wild in 1903 (Walcutt, 1966, pp. 5-16). Again, the great differences in the two stories are found in the audiences and purposes of the authors. To be fair to Burnford, her work should be judged on its own terms, rather than against a classic work of adult literature such as London's novel about Buck, which is far more complex and mysterious than Burnford's in terms of the two works' portrayals of domesticated animals and their responses to experiences in the wilderness. Nevertheless, the specifics of his study call for such a comparison, and Burnford's story falls far short of the accomplishment of London. Her two dogs and cat are too anthropomorphized, too humanized, to be authentic or persuasive as animals. A child will not protest at this, but an intelligent adult reader will be distanced from the story and characters by the author's heavy hand. Even in the brief period before the animals enter the wilderness, Burnford gives them traits and actions which make them more human than animal. The Labr
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
John Thornton, Burnford Longridge, Call Wild, Incredible Journey, Burnford Buck, Alice Wonderland, San Francisco, Noah Flood, Cullinan Carmichael, Children's Literature, stott 1984, incredible journey, child readers, children's stories, human family, children's literature, call wild, stott 1984 60, 1984 60, burnford's story, jan writes, children's literature york, london dogs cat, stott 1984 79, conventional children's story,
Approximate Word count = 2014
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$