| |
| |
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |

Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), which is contained in Chapter 33, Sections 1251 to 1299 of the Act. It grew from the Water Pollution Control Act of 1948, in which Congress authorized the federal government to give state and local governments money to solve water pollution problems (Richman, 1999, p. 1). The act included a grant program to provide money to help local governments design and plan wastewater problems, but the money was never appropriated. Over the next two decades, Congress passed two Federal Water Pollution Control Acts (FWPCA), in 1956 and in 1961, and the Water Quality Act in 1965 (Richman, 1999, p. 2). The 1956 act created the Construction Grants Program, administered by the Public Health Service, to give money to local governments for up to 30 percent of plant construction costs. President John Kennedy signed the first two amendments in 1961. The 1965 act required states to develop water quality standards for interstate waters and created the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration to establish guidelines, approve state standards, and assume responsibility for administering federal assistance (Richman, 1999, p. 2). Four years later, President Nixon proclaimed that environmental protection would be one of his high priorities, and followed through on his promise by creating the EPA in 1970. In 1971, Muskie introduced a comprehensive and prescriptive clean
Related Essays
Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 Congress passed the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), which is contained in Chapter 33 .... (1696 7 )
Air Quality Act Amendments of 1997: Cost-Benefit Analysis .... The sulfate aerosols readily absorb water vapor from the .... Federal law requires the accurate measurement of economic .... One such law, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 .... (2650 11 )
Clean Air of 1990 This paper will briefly dis .... expensive and environmentally disruptive new water-supply projects. .... such a sweeping change in pollution law is .... degree of consultation between federal and state .... (1827 7 )
Employee Commute Option of Clean Air .... Only an invisible water vapor is emitted from the exhaust .... Though the .... is a federal law, states are .... have shown that real spending for pollution abatement and .... (2485 10 )
Removal of Mercury Compounds From Wastewater .... Then, the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (PL 92-500) increased the federal government's role in water pollution regulation. .... (3414 14 )

ollaborate to remediate and preserve estuaries. Over the past 25 years of the CWA, an enormous cost burden has shifted from the federal government to local governments. The more that municipalities spend on clean water, the higher the rates are going to go, and there will be fewer dollars to help communities.
Although the SRF program brought about sweeping changes to the CWA, even greater revisions were proposed in H. R. 961, which the Republican-dominated House of Representatives passed in May 1995. The bill was designed to give dischargers more flexibility to meet standards by altering regulations affecting wetlands, stormwater, industrial pretreatment, and other areas. The Clinton administration opposed H. R. 961, but industry and state and local governments supported it (Richman, 1999, p. 5). Every interest group in Washington, D. C., except the environmental organizations, supported it. The bill reauthorized funding for SRF, but the Senate never proposed a companion bill, and H. R. 961 died.
The purpose of the CWA was to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters. The programs have resulted in significant reductions in the discharge of toxic and organic pollutants i
Category: Government - F
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Clean Water, Action Plan, Administration Richman, SRF Program, SRF Senate, Grants Program, System NPDES, Estuary Program, House Representatives, Control Act, clean water, richman 1999, water pollution, pollution control, local governments, water quality, water pollution control, 1999 1, federal government, action plan, richman 1999 4, wastewater treatment, federal water pollution, construction grants program, pollution control act,
= 1680
= 7 (250 words per page)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
Click Here
to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
|
Debbie B. |
| |
|
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
|
Mike F. |
| |
|
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
|
Carla T. |
| |
|
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
|
Nate A. |
| |
|
"I love this site!!!"
|
Marie H. |
| |
|
| |
|
|