| |
| |
WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |

WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES This research paper presents and analyzes the facts, issues, holdings and reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989), and provides an evaluation of the opinions of various members of the Court in that case. The principal significance of the case lies in the fact that a divided court for the first time substantially modified in effect, if not in so many words, the holding of the leading case in the field of abortion, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Appellees, five health professionals, including three physicians, a nurse and a social worker employed by agencies of the State of Missouri, and two health professionals employed by non-profit organizations which provided abortion services in that state, brought a class action against Webster, the Attorney General of Missouri, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri for declaratory relief and an injunction which challenged the constitutionality of a Missouri statute, MO. REV. STAT. Sections 1.205 et seq. That statute, which had been enacted in June, 1986, regulated certain aspects of abortions performed in that state. The District Court struck down seven provisions of that statute and issued an injunction against its enforcement. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit (hereafter the 8th Circuit) affirmed the decision of the District Court based on the hold
Related Essays
Abortion in the United States .... Abortion in the United States A. Supreme Court decisions (Tonn, 1996) 1. Roe v. Wade (1973) (Sullivan, 1994) 2. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) 3 .... (711 3 )
Impact & Aftermath of Roe v. Wade .... Supp. 1482 (D. Utah 1994). Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 492 US 490 (1989). Williams v. Zbaraz 448 US 358 (1980). Malena .... (5157 21 )
ABORTION RULINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT This rese .... The first decision reflecting the new thinking on the Court was Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 US 490, 109 S. Ct. 3040 (1989). .... (3307 13 )
Abortion debate in American Society .... Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) was an important decision which began when Missouri made rules about "fetus viability" testing before an .... (3984 16 )
Abortion in the United States .... This led to more cases in the Supreme Court. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) was debated in court and outside court before it was made into law. .... (4361 17 )

essed in Roe v. Wade and in Coloutti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379, 388-389 (1979), which he said had made "constitutional law in this area a virtual Procrustean bed" (435). Such a distinction, he said, was "unsound in principle and unworkable in practice" (421).
In his view, the state had a legitimate interest in prescribing procedures for determining when a fetus had viability and that the "requirement of these tests permissibly furthers the state's interest in protecting human life" (437). He viewed the requirement that such tests and examinations be run after the 20 week point as reflective of a presumption by the state that the fetus was viable at that time which the physician would have to rebut through such tests and examinations. He also indicated that he believed that the states have compelling interests in the life of the mother and the welfare of the unborn child throughout the pregnancy and not only after the first trimester, which was a departure from the holding of Roe v. Wade.In her concurring opinion, Justice O'Connor went into
this subject in greater depth. She stated that "it is not unconstitutionally impermissible for the State to enact regulations designed to protect [its] interests in potential life when viabilit
Category: Government - W
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Justice Stevens, Roe Wade, Justice Blackmun, Justice O'Connor, Webster Court, Supreme Court, Coloutti Franklin, Fourteenth Amendment, Blackmun Missouri, Rehnquist Blackmun, roe wade, justice stevens, justice blackmun, fetus viable, 8th circuit, webster court, 14th amendment, holding roe, provisions statute, non-life saving, due process clause, holding roe wade, non-life saving abortions, public facilities personnel, constitutional 14th amendment,
= 4046
= 16 (250 words per page)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
Click Here
to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
|
Debbie B. |
| |
|
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
|
Mike F. |
| |
|
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
|
Carla T. |
| |
|
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
|
Nate A. |
| |
|
"I love this site!!!"
|
Marie H. |
| |
|
| |
|
|