Personality Theory & Gender In Aggression

The personality is defined as referring to a unique style of behavior or thought; a kind of self or inner agent. Psychologists differ in their views of the personality, they use different terms to refer to the concept, such as types, traits, and social learning. Each of the terms is associated with a different personality theory; each theory offers its own definition of personality and human behavior (Gatchel & Mears, 1982). Gender differences in aggression have been found; Bandura's social learning model of the personality can be used to explain the development of these differences.

Research demonstrates that men view aggression as a functional interpersonal act aimed at imposing control over other people, and women view aggression as a breakdown of self control over anger. Rewards for aggression might include: coercive power, social control, normative approval, management of identity, and acquisition of territory, money and peer approval. Studies demonstrate that men feel more positive about aggression and are more likely to be aggressive in public than in private, and they are more willing to use physical as well as verbal forms of attack and experience less quilt and anxiety about aggression than women (Campbell & Muncer, 1994).

Men are found to be characterized by self-assertive traits such as independence, competitiveness and ability to stand up under pressure, suggesting v

. . .
nguishes between learning and performance. He states that sources of learning include response consequences. Responses are followed by a consequence, some are satisfying and some are not, some are not attended to and have little effect. Human behavior is viewed as involving a cognitive mediation of the individual in order for the consequences to have an effect. Response consequences can impart information, motivate future behavior, or reinforce present behavior. Bandura believes, however, that most of our learning is acquired observationally, through modeling, rather than response consequences. Modeling is viewed as more efficient. Modeling involves adding and subtracting from observed behavior and generalizing from one observation to another (Feist 1985). Bandura's Theory & Gender Differences In Aggression Instrumental theories of aggression focus on the consequences of aggression in terms of social or material rewards accrued. Instrumental theory views aggression as a personally functional and learned behavior, with a focus on the interpersonal context and rewards for aggression. Instrumental theory includes Bandura's social learning model of aggression (Campbell & Muncer, 1994). Bandura's theory is that we learn fr
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Campbell Muncer, Lips Colwill, Theory Bandura, According Bandura, Aggression Research, Aggression Instrumental, DIFFERENCES AGGRESSION, Gatchel Mears, According Bandura's, Social Psychology, differences aggression, gender differences aggression, feist 1985, corsini 1977, personality theory, sex differences, gender differences, lips colwill, colwill 1978, social learning, lips colwill 1978, campbell muncer 1994, muncer 1994, social learning model, bandura's social learning,
Approximate Word count = 1829
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Personality Theory & Gender In Aggression