Theories of Society
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Society has been "explained" by different paradigms based in part on underlying ideas about how human beings interact with one another, what they seek in the social setting, and what they have to give up in order to be in a social setting. Three such theories of society can be found with reference to the basis of society: a society based on order and love as exemplified by Plato; a society based on social contract and rights as seen in the writings of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau; and a society based on conflict and economics as seen in Marx. Plato expresses his views on society at greatest length in The Republic in which Socrates speaks of the relationship between the individual human soul and the society of which the individual is a part. The dialogue in this instance is designed to make a moral statement about the nature of the state and its relationship to the individual. Socrates says at the outset: . . .we are bound to admit that the elements and traits that belong to a state must also exist in the individuals that compose it. There is nowhere else for them to come from (Lee, 1987, 209). Socrates has already noted that the state has three natural constituents, wisdom, courage, and self-discipline, and he wants to show that these same three forces are to be found in the human soul: . . . we shall expect to find that the individual has the same three elements in his personality and to be justified in using the same language of him because he is affected by the s
. . .
ate of grace and instead sees men as seeking their own advantage over others through coercion and force. For Rousseau, self-preservation is the first and the most important function of the human being, a function he calls the first law of human nature.
Locke saw the social contract as having as its paramount purpose the protection of property, property which individuals made valuable through their effort:
God gave the World to Men in common; but since he gave it to them for their benefit, and the greatest Conveniences of Life they were capable to draw from it, it cannot be supposed he meant it should always remain common and uncultivated (Laslett, 1988, 291)
Rousseau adds the idea of the general will:
the general will alone can direct the forces of the state in accordance with the purpose for which it was created, namely, the common good. For if the opposition of private interests made the establishment of societies necessary, it is the agreement of those same interests that made it possible (Rousseau, 1986, 25).
Marx explained society in terms of economics, and he presented ideas about history as a struggle between economic forces, a struggle that was evolutionary in that it implied development over time. Marx explained the
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Conveniences Life, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Republic Socrates, Class America, American Society, , Warner WL, WL Warner, Locke Rousseau, Prentice-Hall Lee, social contract, social class, society based, bourgeois society, class antagonisms, basis society, corporation emergent american, class america, john locke, american society, based social contract, corporation emergent, emergent american society, social class america, lee 1987 209,
Approximate Word count = 1665
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Theories of Society
|