Manorialism, feudalism, Serfdom & Economic Growth

The manorial system refers mainly to the connection between nobles and the serfs bound to a given noble's land, while the feudal system refers mainly to the connections between and among nobles of higher and lesser social status. Within social classes, whether among the clergy or the laity, and including the peasantry, there were hierarchical social divisions, but the peasant/serfs were at the bottom of the scale with little hope for social mobility (Cameron, 197, pp. 48-49). The principal way in which manorialism, feudalism, and serfdom encouraged economic growth in Western Europe was the fact that these systemsùwhich varied in details from country to countryùwere indeed systems, mechanisms of social organization and order that facilitated the project of seeing to the basic needs of food, shelter, and clothing for the majority of people. The alternative to this admittedly hierarchical form of social organization might have been complete anarchy. North cites the social disarray following the decline of the Roman Empire and the gradual affiliation of masses of people with military overlords who could protect them (1981, p. 127) and thereby set the stage for increased economic activity (p. 132).

. . .
le of the aftermath of the Hundred Years War in France, where the French crown was faced with a massive infrastructure-rebuilding processùand where the French territory of Burgundy at the time was still held by England, which taxed at a lower rate than the French crown. But, as North explains, France's Charles VII asked for emergency taxes for rebuilding and "used his fiscal revenues effectively, making an advantageous peace with the Burgundians, pushing the English back, an clearing the countryside of outlaws" (North, 1981, pp. 148-9). This was consistent with the state's economy-building function of fostering social stability; the Estates General (French legislature at the time), desirous of social stability in France, agreed to these levies andùsignificantlyùto the crown's right to tax without legislative approval or debate. The result was that the crown could trade its own or others' property rights for tax revenue or appropriate and redistribute property rights in exchange for tax payments (or nonpayment). The result was an increase in tax revenue, as the crown granted monopolistic property rights to guilds and apparently estates that agreed to guarantee the crown revenue based on holding those rights. But it was "a short-run
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Industrial Revolution, Roman Empire, Western Europe, Germany England, Black Death, Death Cipolla, Estates French, Europe AD, Germany Fugger, Middle Ages, economic growth, cameron 1997, property rights, north 1981, cipolla 1994, social stability, economic decline, black death, decline feudalism, economic activity, cameron 1997 pp, york w norton, explain decline feudalism, cameron 1997 76, economic decline north,
Approximate Word count = 4581
Approximate Pages = 18 (250 words per page)