Detection of Melanoma

This study examined the effects of an instructional intervention on the detection of melanoma. Subjects were 50 male and female hospital house staff and residents and attending physicians, chosen from a local hospital, who volunteered to participate. A selection of photographs of skin lesions and melanomas were presented to hospital staff before and after an instructional intervention (lecture). Resulting data was statistically analyzed. It was hypothesized that the instructional intervention would have a significant effect on the detection of melanoma. Findings were significant at a .054 level, demonstrating differences between the pre and posttest which were assumed due to the instructional intervention. Implications of the findings are that further experimental examination of educational interventions regarding melanoma detection is warranted.

Melanoma is reported to be the eighth most common cancer in the United States and the cause of 2 percent of all cancer deaths. Weinstock (2000) reported that melanoma is a substantial public health concern and early detection is feasible and would allow for a cure to be possible. Adequate inspection by dermatologists, primary care physicians, health care professionals, families, and patients would result in early detection.

Dermatologists develop training and skills for the greatest expertise in diagnosis of skin lesions. Patients and f

. . .
to a lack of training and the unlikelihood that they would be faced with a diagnosis, more than twice in a decade of practice. It is also reported that these clinicians lack confidence in their ability to diagnose melanoma and therefore they tend to avoid careful examination of the skin (Weinstock, 2000). Austoker (1994) reported that sunlight is the main cause of melanoma and exposure to the sun can be easily modified if people were aware of this danger. Education for the public and professionals has been initiated in several areas around the world, and results of this effort have been mixed. It has been proposed that checklists should be considered in attempting to diagnose melanoma. A checklist of seven points was devised by MacKie, which was later revised into a major and minor signs. Major signs include change in size, shape, and color, and minor signs include inflammation, crusting, or bleeding, sensory change, diameter>=7 mm. Three or four minor signs requires a referral. A major sign must consider rapid referral and additional presence of one or more minor signs increases the possibility of melanoma (Austoker, 1994). Jackson, Wilkinson, Ranger, Pill, and August (1998) reported findings of using the MacKie risk fa
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Goldstein Goldstein, Results Results, Cohen Tipping, Conclusion Findings, Procedures Data, Introduction Melanoma, MELANOMA Abstract, Pill August, Lesions/Melanoma Answer, Data Analysis, instructional intervention, skin lesions, detection melanoma, photographs skin, weinstock 2000, malignant melanoma, goldstein goldstein 2001, house staff, mean score, goldstein goldstein, hospital house, photographs skin lesions, hospital house staff, photos pre posttest, house staff residents,
Approximate Word count = 2322
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Detection of Melanoma