LAW OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

The Law of Comparative Advantage, and Ricardo's Interpretation of the Law of Comparative Advantage

To understand the law of comparative advantage, it is necessary to understand the differences between absolute advantage and comparative advantage when the concepts are considered within the context of international trade. Both absolute advantage and comparative advantage apply to specific products (goods primarily when the theory of comparative advantage was first formulated; goods and services in the current day).

A state is said to have an absolute advantage over another state in relation to a specific product when the first state is able to product a specific product in the quantities desired at a lower absolute cost than absolute cost that the second state can produce the same product in the quantities desired. Absolute advantage, therefore, is a straight-forward, easily understood concept.

The concept of comparative advantage considered within the context of international trade is not concerned only with the

. . .
third state. Costs were the prime point of focus for Ricardo in relation to the theory of comparative advantage. Responses of Other Early-Day Economists Toward the Law of Comparative Advantage Ricardo had both supporters and opponents in relation to his stance on international trade. Ricardo was concerned about maintaining the economic viability of Great Britain. His approach to assuring continued economic viability was the promotion of international trade. This stance brought him into direct conflict with the latter day mercantilists. David Hume and Adam Smith had advanced theories that undercut the mercantilist arguments; however, the thought persisted in many quarters. Mercantilism, according to its proponents during its heyday, was a nation-building policy exercised through a series of control measures to protect a domestic economy from hostile foreign countries (Scott, 2002). A major goal of mercantilist policy was the maintenance of a positive balance of trade measurable in gold. The major tenets of mercantilist policy were as follows (Rempel, 2002): Bullionism (maintain a pnsitive balance nf precious metals); Balance of Trade (maintain a balance of exports over imports); Economic Self-Sufficiency; Tariffs (high
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Comparative Advantage, Activities Committee, Europe Japan, Adam Smith, Economy Taxation, Hilsenrath Buckman, comparative advantage, Regulation Commerce, Advantage Ricardo, Ekelund HTbert, Corn Trade, law comparative, law comparative advantage, theory comparative, international trade, theory comparative advantage, opportunity cost, absolute advantage, comparative costs, comparative advantages, developed economies, develop comparative, develop comparative advantages, concept comparative advantage, asset factor production,
Approximate Word count = 2087
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

More Essays on LAW OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE