Current U.S.-Latin American Relations
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The greatest international change affecting U.S.-Latin American relations today is perhaps the steady transformation of the world economy from a series of loosely connected national markets to an increasingly interdependent global one(Lowenthal, pp. 66). In this, the nature of multilateralism in international relations is changing; in an environment of collective action and free trade organizations, it is an increasingly difficult task to define the role of the United States in the burgeoning economy of the Western Hemisphere. Specifically, are collective action, national sovereignty, and United States leadership compatible goals in this new configuration? If we confine our interests abroad specifically to the achievement of economic(and not necessarily political) harmony, perhaps the United States may continue to enjoy its superpower status for decades to come. First, it is necessary to consider whether a multilateralist approach to Latin America will diminish the role of the United States in the region. As it stands today, the United States does adhere to the multilateral approach in dealing with market access and unfair trade practices(Garten, 1995, pp. 50). Interestingly, in recent years, the U.S. has sustained criticism from foreign leaders who claim that American trade practices have moved away from multilateralism towards a bilateral(even unilateral) system(Garten, 1995, pp. 51). Actually, as the face of global economics has changed, so has the American asse
. . .
he ability of the United States to advance its already prominent role in the Western Hemisphere. Admittedly, in the modern age, our prominence will rely on our ability to maintain a strong economy of our own. The end of the cold war dictates that our strategic concerns be social and economic, not militaristic and political(Lowenthal, pp. 70-71). And for this, we should be thankful. It is only in the sphere of economics that the United States may retain a degree of national sovereignty in Latin America.
However, can our national sovereignty be protected as we promote international cooperation? So far, the evidence suggests that it can. As strategic and security issues diminish and economic and social questions take their place, policy will be made more often by the pull of advocacy and negotiation. Thus, as an extension of strictly economic ties, the ties of advocacy will also potentially elevate United States sovereignty. In opening up the channels of commerce, various organizations will arise in effort to compete to shape policy in the United States(Lowenthal, pp. 77).
The process of adjusting to free-trade with the world's largest and most powerful economy has already illuminated a desire among Latin American nation
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Latin America, Western Hemisphere, Latin American, HornThe Economist, US-Latin American, Hemisphere Admittedly, Hemisphere Specifically, President Gore, United States', United StatesLowenthal, western hemisphere, collective action, latin america, 1995 pp, national sovereignty, multilateral approach, international cooperation, economist 1995 pp, latin american, economist 1995, pp 26, agenda collective action, national sovereignty protected, 1995 pp 51, 1995 pp 26,
Approximate Word count = 1438
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Current U.S.-Latin American Relations
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
