Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

NetDynamics Case

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Developing software successfully means not only that a company is able to write quality software, but that the software solves a business need and that the software can be brought to market in a timely fashion. If the software does not meet a legitimate need, then it will find no market. If the software cannot be brought to market in a timely manner, other companies will step in and take market share. If the software does not have sufficient quality, customers are unlikely to invest additional money for upgrades, and word will spread that the software is deficient. Bringing all of these elements together is difficult, and all software goes through a development cycle. In some cases, the cycle is neither formal nor documented; in other cases, the development follows one of several documented models. This analysis considers the case of Net Dynamics 2.0, a software product designed to help business integrate databases with Web pages for more efficient on-line service.

Software Development Life Cycle Models

Of the many life cycles which characters software development, several are appropriate to understand the situation at Spider Technologies. These include the code and fix model, the waterfall model, the prototyping model and the timebox model. The code and fix model is used by many start-up companies which assume that everyone in the organization (which may only be a few people) understands the goal of the company and that formal development procedures a

. . .
a limited amount of time be used to develop the critical features of a product, and that the time limit determines the definition of the product. When the time limit is reached, no new features are added to that version. Instead, additional features may be incorporated into future versions of the release. The advantage of the timebox model is that it prevents software engineers from "engineering" a project forever, and forces the company to release products in a reasonable timeframe. The disadvantage of this model is that critical success features might be left out of a version which hampers its ability to perform in the market and which limits the market's willingness to invest in future versions of the product. Net Dynamics 2.0 Net Dynamics 2.0 was beset with problems from the beginning of its development. The goal was to create a version of the successful Net Dynamics product for both the UNIX and NT operating systems; currently, Net Dynamics runs only on the UNIX operating system. Design work for the new version was begun in December 1995; the goal was to have a product ready in three months (an example of the timebox model being put into place). The team which developed Net Dynamics 2.0 included three new hires, incl
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Spider Technologies, Net Dynamics, Introduction Developing, UNIX NT, Spider Technology, Studio Runtime, Cycle Models, net dynamics, code fix, net dynamics 20, waterfall model, code fix model, timebox model, fix model, dynamics 20, life cycle, spider technologies, software development, waterfall approach, Life Cycle, unix operating system, team developed net, brought market timely,
Approximate Word count = 1444
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW