Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Scientific Inquiry in Public Administration

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Upon examining a variety of perspectives in the field of public administration, writers from several points of view, it seems that there is a need for more scientific inquiry in the area of public administration, a need for systematic research to solve the problems of administration in government. A reflection on the writings of Kuhn, Kitcher, Maslow, and McGregor highlights their philosophies in terms of everyday administration in the public domain. Some of the writing is not directly applicable, but one can indirectly extrapolate meanings important for government.

Kuhn emphasizes the importance of objective scientific inquiry for the discovery of new phenomena. He notes that "clearly we need a new vocabulary and concepts for analyzing events" (Kuhn, 1996, p.55). More public information is needed, for example, on why the U.S. was the brunt of terrorism in 2001, why the average person has to little knowledge of Middle Eastern cultures, and how the U.S. dependence on oil exacerbates tension in relations between the U.S. and other countries.

In the wake of the fall of the Twin Towers, public administrators in the U.S. had much to deal with in terms of public fear and the collapse of myths concerning U.S. invulnerability. As ancient Egyptian myths of the night occurring because a serpent swallows the sun, so the U.S. had to face the uncomfortable fact that the U.S. consumer society and control of entertainment media considerably raises the ire of others abroad (Kuhn

. . .
t people to acquiesce to the law, a law that was never intended to become long-term legislation. It is unlikely that an IRS auditor would be interested in the fact that someone evaded taxes because they were self-actualizing for those particular years. A great deal of scientific research goes into presidential and gubernatorial campaigns. Focus groups in major cities around the country constantly monitor various segments of the population and their response to specific types of ads. It would be beneficial if such stringent research would be applied to factors in low voter turnout. Why is it that younger age groups do not vote and large groups in general do not vote because they cannot see any differences between he parties? Such research would be very beneficial in determining the true tenor of public thinking and degree of helplessness and despair over public government and its ability to truly help the common individual. Although Maslow's work was done half a century ago, it still is timely in terms of the over-all needs of the whole person. Such research seems not to be a part of current public administration, however. Welfare programs have been drastically cut, so that lower income individuals, pregnant teenagers, a
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Shafritz Hyde, Revenue Service, Middle Eastern, Twin Towers, Hills Bel-Air, Princess Wales, Maslow McGregor, United Scientific, Frederick II, , public administration, shafritz hyde, shafritz hyde 1997, middle eastern, kitcher 2001, hyde 1997, scientific inquiry, kuhn 1996, public administrators, 1997 p115, hyde 1997 p115, middle eastern descent, stringent research, field public administration,
Approximate Word count = 1635
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$