Motivating Employees

Understanding motivation and performance begins with understanding that the workers are not necessarily to be blamed if their performance or motivation is not what the supervisor envisions. Instead of assuming that the workers in question are lazy or unskilled or unwilling to perform the task at hand, the wise manager seeks to understand why the workers are not performing to his expectations. While it may be that the workers do not possess the requisite skills (which can be remedied through training), there may be other factors involved which are more complicated and which reach to the heart of effective management. Assuming that the workers are being willfully disobedient or unproductive is to put responsibility where it does not belong (McGregor, 1985, p. 10).

There are a number of different approaches to work motivation, most of which can be broken down into either content theories or process theories. Content theories focu

. . .
re to develop their own potential (Finck, Timmers & Mennes, 1998, p. 55). Another view of work motivation, developed by Fred Herzberg, is the two-factor theory. This theory holds that the factors which contribute to job satisfaction are different from the factors which contribute to job dissatisfaction. Factors that led to satisfaction were termed motivator factors, while factors that contributed to dissatisfaction were deemed hygiene factors. Herzberg held that the absence of motivator factors would not make employees unhappy, but would leave them feeling neutral about their jobs. Similarly, addressing hygiene factors would result in little more than neutral feelings from employees, while failing to meet hygiene factors would result in strong dissatisfaction. This approach is significant in that it suggests that the issues that lead to satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not the same (Moats Kennedy, 1998, p. 51). Expectancy theories attempt to explain worker motivation in terms of anticipated rewards. These theoretical models assume that individuals make rational decisions based on economic realities. These theories have gained much attention because they stem from the idea that personal and situational influences are i
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Motivation Consequences, Motivation Managers, According Maslow, Theories Understanding, Gordon DiTomaso, Conclusion Motivation, Henry Murray, Scanlan Keys, Moats Kennedy, Fred Herzberg, effort lead, performance evaluation, organizational behavior, increased effort, process theories, hygiene factors, hygiene factors result, moats kennedy, organization future, people seek, moats kennedy 1998, factors result, timmers mennes 1998, effort lead performance, finck timmers mennes,
Approximate Word count = 2314
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Motivating Employees