MICROSOFT VERSUS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
This is an excerpt from the paper...
MICROSOFT VERSUS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEOn November 6, 1999, the Los Angles Times headline AMicrosoft Empire a Monopoly, Judge Says in Antitrust Case@ (Shiver 1) suggested an end to the antitrust case which has been going on for the past nine years. The word Asuggested@ is used because the declaration was a Afinding of fact@ and the case is still open to appeal and the damages, if any, are still to be determined, as is the status of the case. Still claiming damages are Connecticut and 18 other states. AConnecticut Attorney Gen. Richard Blumenthal indicated that [the states] are likely to be more hard-nosed in the wake of Judge Jackson=s decision@ (Shiver 1). The U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson said in his 207-page finding AMicrosoft has demonstrated that it wil
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Penfield Jackson, ACase@ A12, Case@ Shiver, District Columbia, Angeles Times, Justice Department, FTC Aug, Dallas Morning, Judge Jackson=s, Richard Blumenthal, times 6 nov, angeles times, 6 nov 1999, los angeles times, 6 nov, los angeles, times 6, shiver 1, angeles times 6, nov 1999, amicrosoft empire, nov 1999 a12, anti-trust actions, empire monopoly, antitrust case@,
Approximate Word count = 530
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page)
More Essays on MICROSOFT VERSUS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|