Megan's Law Statutes

Today, every state in the nation as well as the federal government has enacted a "Megan's Law" statutes. Essentially, these laws require that convicted sexual offenders register with local authorities when they move into a neighborhood. The laws also require that local residents be notified when such offenders move into their communities. In some cases, these laws allow the publishing of sexual offenders addresses on the Internet as a means of public notification. A third variation of such statutes also requires that sexual offenders who have completed their sentence but who remain a perceived threat to society may be involuntarily committed in psychiatric institutions until such time as they are determined to no longer pose a threat to society.

Not surprisingly, critics of these laws argue that they violate the constitutional rights of convicted sex offenders. In particular, critics point to the constitutional protections against double jeopardy, invasion of privacy, cruel and unusual punishment, and ex-post facto laws. Such critics, however, are in the difficult position of arguing for the constitutional rights of individuals who have often committed heinous crimes involving children against the pictures of their young, innocent victims. It is not surprising, therefore, that these laws have largely withstood constitutional scrutiny. This paper explores the constitutional issues surrounding Megan's Laws and concludes with some seemingly si

Related Essays

Sexual Offender Registration .... Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S.Ct .... "Megan's Law." New Jersey Public Laws 1994, chapter.133 (codified at Title 2C .... New Jersey Statutes Annotated (NJSA) 2C:7-1 through 7-ll .... (2724 11 )

MANDATORY SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Introductio .... (May, 1998). Megan's law expanded in New Jersey. .... Facts on File, 55(2869), p. 874. Sue, D., Sue, D. & Sue, S. (1994). .... .... and Psychology Review, 20, 263-274. .... (6787 27 )

VICTIMOLOGY This research paper discusses victi .... Pepperdine .... Review, 17, 19-33. Estrich, S. (1992). .... .... & Human Behavior, 20, 607-619. Greissman, AV (1996, Summer). The fate of Megan's law in New York. .... (4320 17 )

ld that such statutes did not violate constitutional proscriptions against ex-post facto laws because such laws were civil regulatory schemes and not punitive in nature. The United States Supreme Court has also rejected other constitutional arguments against such laws. For example, in Kansas v. Hendricks, the Supreme Court faced the issue of whether the State of Kansas' post-sentence involuntary commitment statute for sex offenders violated their constitutional rights against cruel and unusual punishment and double jeopardy. Essentially, Hendricks argued, similar to the argument in Westerheide, that an involuntary commitment after he had completed his sentence effectively sentenced him to a second and indefinite term of punishment for a crime for which he had already served his sentence. Here, the Supreme Court again held that Kansas' statute was a civil action rather than a criminal procedure and, therefore, did not trigger any criminal procedural protections. Nonetheless, registration opponents argue that sex offenders should not have to endure additional post-sentence requirements because they have paid their debt to society and such laws only punish them for their status as sex offenders rather than for any particular

Category: Government - M