Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Los Angeles Political Development: 1870-1939

This is an excerpt from the paper...

This research examines the political development of the City of Los Angeles during the "patronage period." For the purposes of this research, the term "patronage period" is defined as the 1870-1939 time frame. In reality, patronage never disappears from political activity. Therefore, in effect, this research reviews a period in Los Angeles when the functioning of patronage or machine politics was more or less openly acknowledged.

The late-nineteenth century in the United States was a period of rapid social transformation (Lee 539). The old political institutions, largely adapted to a static, agrarian society, were no longer adequate for the needs of a modern industrial society. Class conflicts developed as rapid economic growth brought with it trusts and monopolies, growing labor unrest, and a corrupting alliance of government and business·government by patronage Large-scale immigration led to the development of urban slums, inadequacies in public services, and a "proliferation of machine politics" (Lee 539). Traditional societal elites felt threatened as the principles of "limited majoritarianism and elite governance were challenged by the growing demand for mass participation" (Lee 539). Populists were equally discontented as the concentration of economic power led to fundamental political inequality (Ross 1991).

The major administrative reforms in the public sector in this period were the civil service reform movement in

. . .
zin 377). Unionists "unstintingly yoked their fortunes to candidates, parties, and legal reforms that promised to make the government more responsive to working-class concerns" (Kazin 377). Until the First World War, white workers in California's urban centers often had a so-called labor party for which to vote (Lewis 210-226). Labor gave such parties "at least a plurality of their votes, although none of the chosen vehicles was a frequent winner or dedicated itself to social change once in office" (Kazin 377). When the labor unions could not mount an independent ticket, most union leaders aligned themselves with one of the major parties and, in return, received nominations, and appointments for themselves, and legislation to benefit their members·patronage (Kazin 378). Political involvement flowed from the labor movement's claim to be the representative of all white working-class Californians (Kazin 378). The campaign by labor for Asian exclusion required continuous pressure on office-holders in both Sacramento and Washington contributed to this self-image, but it was not the sole influence. Craft unionists regularly participated in municipal campaigns in which the issue of Chinese and Japanese immigration played only a mi
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Los Angeles, East Midwest, Background Period, Angeles Kazin, World War, Asians Afro-Americans, Gray Otis, San Francisco, Angeles Mexicans, los angeles, United Urban, labor movement, san francisco, kazin 381, labor unions, kazin 377, lewis 210-226, world war, erie 519-554, san francisco los, francisco los, francisco los angeles, urban affairs quarterly, los angeles 1870-1939, california labor movement,
Approximate Word count = 2708
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$