Locke and Rousseau on the Nature of Government

Two philosophers who have contributed a great deal to an understanding of the relationship between citizens and government are Jean Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. The purpose of this report is to compare and contrast Rousseau's and Locke's theories regarding the ways in which the governed and the government must and should interact in order to ensure the continuation of a society that is stable, orderly, and conducive to prosperity, equality, and justice for its members. To that end, ideas advanced by each theorist will be discussed and compared. The topic is of significance in that many of the fundamental views reflected in the normative documents of democratic nation-states derive, at least in part, from principles and constructs advanced by Locke and/or Rousseau.

Specific texts such as Locke's The Second Treatise on Civil Government and Rousseau's Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on the Political Economy, and On the Social Contract will be employed in the report. Additionally, reference to materials discussed in the class will be made. The critical difference between the two theorists to be explicated herein is that Rousseau argued for a far more active role for citizens than did Locke (Rousseau, 1987, p. 176).

During the February 20, 2004 Friday Lecture, Locke's belief that we know through the exercise of the faculty of reason rather than faith was discussed, leading to the conclusion that reason

Related Essays

Locke and Rousseau on the Nature of Government .... focus has been on developing a comparison of the ideas advanced by John Locke (1986) and Jean Jacques Rousseau (1987) on the nature and purpose of government. .... (2773 11 )

Locke, Rousseau & Mill on Government .... freedoms enjoyed by men in a state of nature. Rousseau (353) rejected governments that were inherently despotic because .... Locke felt much the same in that he .... (1410 6 )

Locke, Hobbes and Roussau on Government .... Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau offer conceptions of .... emphasis on civic responsibility, while Locke places more .... for the anarchy of the state of nature. .... (1052 4 )

Concepts of Equality in Locke and Rousseau .... and disaster. Rousseau differs with Locke with respect to the state of nature and its relation to liberty. Whereas Locke .... (2002 8 )

Ideas of Locke, Rousseau & Hobbes .... Like Locke, Rousseau believed that all political theory beings .... More importantly, though, Rousseau's 1762 publication of the .... which the state of nature could be .... (1230 5 )

rity for oneself, one's family, and one's property. Rousseau (1987) said that the social contract was necessary because society breeds war (here he agreed with Hobbes on the probability that human beings would turn to violence and anarchy in order to gain authority and acquire possessions). Because society breeds war, Rousseau (1987) argued that there is a demand implicit in society for a system of law to impose law and tranquility, leading to an agreement between men to live under a political system. The nature of this social contract invariably depends on the ability of men to negotiate rights, the distribution of power, and societal control. Here, Rousseau (1987) responded to earlier ideas and asserted that while sovereignty must be absolute or nothing, but that it was possible for men to be at once free and members of a political society. Rousseau (1987) (in both The Social Contract and The Discourses) saw dictatorship as an unacceptable system of government which should be permitted only for a very brief period. Were dictatorships to be adopted on a permanent basis, Rousseau (1987) said that any dictatorship will become either tyrannical or idle. Nevertheless, Rousseau (1973) recognized that there were those

Category: Government - L