Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Jim Carrey and Charlie Chaplin

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Robert Glatzer (2003, p. 2), in a review of Bruce Almighty stated that Jim Carrey "is a man who would like to be Charlie Chaplin -- who also built everything about himself -- but he fatally lacks Chaplin's genius." In this report, Glatzer's (2003) comparison of Carrey and Chaplin will be examined. It will be argued that though harsh, Glatzer's statement is an accurate assessment of the relative talents of these two cinematic superstars.

Some background on the critical response to the work of Charlie Chaplin is necessary. David Weddle (2003) examined several of Chaplin's feature films and argued that Charlie Chaplin was always willing to take enormous risks. He continued to make silent films such as City Lights after sound had been introduced into the movie industry. He also, in The Great Dictator, satirized Adolf Hitler at a time when the world was beginning to recognize Hitler's evil. Released in 1940, The Great Dictator grossed more than any of Chaplin's previous pictures and its success encouraged him to develop Monsieur Verdoux, in which he played a con artist who seduced old widows, married them, and then killed them.

Chaplin, as an actor, writer, and director/producer, created in the character of the Little Tramp, an icon of the silver screen that remains powerful today. He was a prolific worker, making 35 comedies in his first year of filmmaking under the direction of Mac Sennett of Keystone Films. It has been said that "

. . .
t one of several very similar faces of Jim Carrey. Where Charlie Chaplin became the Little Tramp, there is nothing to truly distinguish Jim Carrey from Ace Ventura or Ace Ventura from the lead character in Liar Liar. The depth that can be found in a performance by Chaplin as the Little Tramp is what made Chaplin a genius and his long-running character such a success (Weddle, 2003). Underneath the silliness and the slapstick in which Chaplin engaged as the Little Tramp was a complete human being -- a person capable of compassion, intensity, fear, and the entire gamut of human emotions. In his most popular roles as the over-the-top pet detective, Jim Carrey never or rarely moves beneath the surface. He mugs and hams it up for the camera when a more subtle or nuanced performance would be more effective. Even when playing Truman in The Truman Show, Carrey continued to use his highly mobile face to underscore the comedic aspects of the characters life. Truman is not a fully rounded character in the same way that the Little Tramp is. This is an important distinction and one which suggests that Jim Carrey, though enormously talented and extremely popular is simply not a latter day Charlie Chaplin. Bruce Almighty, Carrey's
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Jim Carrey, Charlie Chaplin, Little Tramp, Chaplin Carrey, Trimble Carrey's, Liar Liar, Tramp Chaplin, Interestingly Weddle, Chris Nashawaty, Truman Carrey, jim carrey, charlie chaplin, little tramp, bruce almighty, natale 2000, ace ventura, kauffmann 2002, glatzer 2003, weddle 2003, carrey charlie chaplin, carrey charlie, jim carrey charlie, dick van dyke, character little tramp, peter sellers dick,
Approximate Word count = 2461
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$