Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

ESOPs and Profit Sharing

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) has been in existence formally since 1974 when the U.S. Congress codified ERISA. ESOPs are considered to be one of the fastest growing and most visible forms of employee benefit plans in the United States. ESOPs can be traced to the concepts of Louis Kelso, who observed during the Great Depression that there were significant failures of system design that had created a situation in which large-scale productive capacity in the form of idle factories was positioned alongside consumers desperately wanting the goods those idle factories were physically capable of producing and workers equally desperate in their need for income-producing jobs.

Kelso ultimately developed a strategy for income redistribution that would help to maintain widespread purchasing power in the economy. Kelso's argument was that the effort at income redistribution should be directed upstream rather than downstream. In other words, policymakers should emphasize not only the widespread employment of labor resources, but the widespread ownership of capital resources.

The first true ESOP was designed by Kelso in 1956 and involved the Peninsula Newspapers Incorporated ownership, whose principal shareholders owned 72 percent of the company's stock and wanted to sell their stock to the employees who did not have the funds with which to make the purchase. Kelso found a 1953 Internal Revenue Service ruling suggesting that a defined contribution empl

. . .
d additional stimulus by increasing the one percent credit to a 1.5 percent credit. The additional one-half percent contribution to the TRASOP by the employer had to be used to match voluntary employee contributions. Later still, in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Congress replaced TRASOP with a payroll-based plan known as PAYSOP. This gave sponsoring employers a tax credit equal to one-half percent of payroll compensation that was paid to all participants in the PAYSOP. The primary impetus for this move was that TRASOPs were being utilized largely by capital intensive companies which Congress viewed as an overly limited application. The PAYSOP could be used by any corporation with employees. According to Gates, the 1974 Trade Act provided a preference for ESOP companies in conjunction with a loan and loan guarantee program for communities adversely impacted by foreign trade. It was in 1975 that ESOPs began to expand among large and capital intensive companies and when Congress amended the tax code to increase the investment tax credit from 7 to 10 percent. Gates states that "as part of this increase, Finance Committee Chairman Russell Long suggested that companies be allowed to claim an extra one percent in
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Title ERISA, Social Security, Federal Register, Code Section, Tax Act, Labor Department, Senator Russell, Prior January, ESOP Comparing, Reform Act, profit-sharing plans, closely held, employer securities, profit-sharing plan, employee benefit, profit sharing, benefit plans, tax credit, stock bonus, profit sharing plan, employee stock, employee stock ownership, employee benefit plans, closely held corporation, stock bonus plan,
Approximate Word count = 8527
Approximate Pages = 34 (250 words per page)

More Essays on ESOPs and Profit Sharing

PERFORMANCE, REWARD, AND TRAINING 1443 words
Ties Between Performance and Reward 1443 words
Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan 9289 words
ESOP 10082 words
Motivation ampamp Reward Strategies 1460 words
HR Strategies to Improve Retention of Supervisors 6873 words
Management Retention At Ford Motor Company Plant 9066 words
Problem of Turnover At a Ford Plant 7315 words
Motivation and Reward Strategy , 1493 words
Effects of Employee Ownership 2543 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW