Export of Pesticides
This is an excerpt from the paper...
At issue is the passage of "The Pesticide Export Reform Act of 1990" (originally S.2227), which includes a number of provisions that would significantly change the export of pesticides, the importation and testing of food products, and the procedures used to notify other countries about pesticides. The Bill's passage may depend, not on its intrinsic merits against which many of its critics do not argue, but possibly on a prevailing political philosophy which will determine the priorities of its objectives. One could also wonder about the alternatives Senator Leahy might have considered in 1990, as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry in a Democratically-controlled Congress and a Republican President , if he had a hint of a forthcoming totally-opposite political construct in 1994. S.2227 was designed primarily to eliminate the export of U.S. manufactured pesticides that had not been registered for domestic use and which were not, under existing legislation, subject to the EPA's registration procedures. Chemicals produced for example, for use on bananas would need a U. S. registration even though virtually no bananas were grown in the United States. It was a judicious decision: "Mr. Bell is sterile. He is a banana worker and, like several thousand other Costa Rican men in the same boat, he blames his trouble on a pesticide, DBCP, used on the plantation . . . and manufactured or used by . . . Dow Chemical, Shell Oil, Standard Fruit and Chiqu
. . .
mical producers in the world was not overlooked.
Support from developing country governments comes in the form of an explanation that there was a dependency on U. S. information and other sources such as the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization for free, available information about pesticides, their health, their environmental effects, and their alternative controls. An organization of liberal farmers, the American Agriculture Movement, offers their support in terms of an heuristic argument that charged it would be unfair for foreign farmers to be allowed to use chemicals which could not be used in the U.S., and that prohibiting the import of products with residues of unregistered pesticides would do much to eliminate this unfair advantage.
Opponents simply declare, without challenging the accuracy of the "Circle of Poison" charge, that disallowing the export of the pesticides in question would not stop their use on imported food products because these chemicals would simply be supplied by other countries, and that the net effect would be a loss of jobs in the pesticide industry. Further political opposition, best described as exceptionally vague, proposed that these issues should
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Consent PIC, Chemicals Association, DBCP Arco, Circle Poison, Clinton Administration's, Republican President, Reform Act, Agriculture EPA, Agriculture Movement, Marketing Reporter, developing countries, 1994 7, chemical marketing, chemical marketing reporter, marketing reporter, importing country, export pesticides, food products, pesticide export, marketing reporter 31, 31 january 1994, pesticides jersey, jersey enslow, january 1994 7, muddling wilson quarterly,
Approximate Word count = 1958
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Export of Pesticides
|