Attribution Theory
The development of bias in an indiv
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The development of bias in an individual or a population is a subject of much study in psychology, as well as of great concern in sociology and politics. Racial prejudice is often subtle, and many people who believe they do not have such prejudices may actually show evidence that they do. The question is whether people tend to make assumptions about minorities different from those they make about majorities. There are other biases which may not be as evident but which also shape our decisions and how we deal with other people. One area of psychological inquiry that offers an answer to this question is that of attribution theory, and an examination of attribution theory shows why people do make assumptions and react on the basis of those assumptions thereafter. Attribution theory involves the way people infer the causes of behavior, and it centers on the perceived causes of behavior, explaining the processes by which the individual comes to understand his or her own behavior and that of others. Heider is the founder of attribution theory, and he notes several kinds of causal attributions made by people. Situational causes are those affected by the environment; personal effects are those things one influences personally; ability is the ability to do something; effort is the attempt to do something, desire is wanting to do something; sentiment is feeling lime doing something; belonging is going alone with something; obligation is feeling one oug
. . .
ose a structure on the environment as we perceive it to maximize cognitive efficiency. We impose this structure by organizing features into meaningful clusters or categories. There are four characteristics to these categories. First, the categories reflect the actual structural organization of both man-made and natural phenomena, and recognition of this implicit structure is a consequence of observing the correlated occurrences of objects and attributes. A category is generally defined in terms of the dimensions that provide us with the greatest amount of salient information, and irrelevant or unimportant distinctions among members of a given category are ignored. Second, the categories consist of a number of objects that are considered equivalent, and this fact is reflected in the perceived similarity among the category members. Some researchers have even stated that categorization results in an exaggeration of the differences between members of different categories and an underestimation of differences among members of the same category. Third, characteristics of the members of the category are thought to be represented by a prototype, a plausible ideal case of the category. Finally, because category members are thought
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Wilder Cooper, Heider Kelley, Harvey Weary, Weary Stanley, THEORY Attribution, Maria Janet, , APPLICATION Jim's, CONCLUSION Attribution, Lewin Weiner, attribution theory, cooper 1981, wilder cooper, harvey weary, social attributions, attribution social, direct evidence, wilder cooper 1981, sereno 1999, attitudes direct evidence, krupat 1982, jersey lawrence erlbaum, own behavior, harvey weary 1985,
Approximate Word count = 2096
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
|