Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Problems with Eyewitness Testimony

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The American legal system places much importance and value on eyewitness testimony, and the public at large also seems to see such testimony as reliable. Given the fact that there are strong indications that such evidence is highly unreliable, this fact is troubling in a system that depends so heavily on jurors to know when to accept such testimony and when to reject it. An examination of some of the research findings shows that there is a need for jurors to be given more guidance in how to interpret eyewitness testimony either from the court or as a matter of course by the defense attorney. Cognitive psychology shows that there is a problem with the blind acceptance of eyewitness reliability, but we should also realize that overcoming the tendency of jurors to accept such testimony on its face will be a difficult undertaking. People tend to believe what they see with their own eyes, and when they become jurors, they put themselves in the place of the eyewitness and think that they can again believe in the reliability of their "own" senses.

We are all familiar with classroom demonstrations of eyewitness unreliability--even if we have never experienced such a test ourselves, we have seen it depicted on television and in movies. Scrivner and Safer (1988) report on such a test, in this case with the use of a videotape instead of a live "perpetrator." The videotape is unusually dense with details, showing 47 violent and nonviolent details of a burglary in a two minute peri

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Scrivner Safer, Treadway McCloskey, , eyewitness testimony, Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, racial stereotypes, scrivner safer, treadway mccloskey, Brigham JC, MA Safer, play role, eyewitness identification, accept testimony, M McCloskey, eyewitness identification accuracy, relationship confidence, cognitive psychology, reports expectations, jurors accept testimony,
Approximate Word count = 1079
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Problems with Eyewitness Testimony

Neorobiological Basis of Memory Introduction Memory is a ... 2936 words
Children as Witnesses in Court 2023 words
DNA fingerprinting evidence 3144 words
HYPNOSIS and Memory Recall 3090 words
Indian Wars ampamp Battle of Wounded Knee 10951 words
Case Study Method 4888 words
Islamic Penology CHAPTER III 9908 words
DNA Defined and Delineated 2837 words
Actual Innocence 2592 words
The Justice for All Organization 2542 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW