History of the War in Vietnam

reassumed its position as a colonial power in Southeast Asia.Å  4.ls1

1J. Buttinger, Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol. 1 (New ì

York: Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, 1967), 183.

Soon thereafter, however, France found itself embroiled in a ì

bitter war in Vietnam, then a part of French Indo-China, were one ì

element of the Vietnamese population was seeking political ì

independence for the country from France. Over the ensuing ì

decade, the physical, monetary, and human losses suffered by both ì

France and the Vietnamese were enormous.ì

The French defeat at Dien Bien Phu in May 1954 led directly ì

to the Geneva Conference in that same year in which accords were ì

reached that marked the exit of France from Southeast Asia, ì

placed the United States squarely in the position as the major ì

Western presence in Southeast Asia, and moved the long-running ì

war in Vietnam into a new phase.ô 
4.ls1

2J. Buttinger, Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol. 2 (New ì

York: Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, 1967), 834-845.

ô  This study examined the Geneva ì

Accords of 1954 that were reached in the Geneva Conference called ì

to deal with the Vietnam question. The positions of the French, ì

who were seeking a graceful exit from Southeast Asia by this ì

. . .
which it is directed to relinquish values that would not ì  = 6 á2
ìèotherwise be relinquished. There is a distinction between the ì ì power to hurt and the power to seize or hold forcibly is ì ì important. The use of coercion requires that the using party ì ì possess the power to hurt the party to which the coercion is ì ì applied. The success of coercive action depends more on the ì ì threat of what is yet to come than on damage already done.ì  ääá The use of coercion also requires that the interests of the ì ì two parties concerned not be absolutely opposed. If the coercing ì ì party had no commonality of interest with the target party, it ì ì would simply impose the hurt on that target party, rather than ì ì attempting to gain its objectives through coercive action. The ì ì use of coercion as a form of political participation, however, is ì ì always a high-risk action, because it is quite likely to inspire ì ì an unpleasant response from the target party.ì  ääá Coercive diplomacy focuses upon affecting the enemy's will ì ì rather than upon negating his capabilities. The threats employed ì ì in coercive diplomacy may be purely verbal; at
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Science Review, Martin's Press, ì ì, North Vietnam, Hong Kong, Knopf Publishers, University Press, Geneva Conference, Michael Handel, Vietnam America's, World War,  ääá, ì , ì  ääá, 4ls1 , 4ls1  ääá, 6 á2
, = 6 á2
, = 6,  = 6,  =, ì  =, ì united, ì american, ääá the,
Approximate Word count = 7350
Approximate Pages = 29 (250 words per page)