Aristotle & Locke on Property
The purpose of this resear
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine similarities and differences between Aristotle's discussion of the forms of property in Book One of the Politics and Locke's discussion of Property in the Second Treatise of Government. The plan of the research will be to set forth the principal lines of argument in each work, and then to discuss by means of comparison and contrast the manner and significance of the intersections and diversions of the two arguments.Aristotle's treatment of the forms of property begins, not with a discussion of real (land) or personal (movable) property but rather with a discussion of slaves as property. What is crucial is that slaves are considered to be a part of the "life of the household and its activity, rather than with production: he [the slave] does not help in the making of things, but in living [of the master] and all its activities. . . . [T]he slave, but also the things which he tends, belong to the area of living and the activities of living rather than to those of production" (Barker 11). In the preamble to Chapter V, Aristotle cites the master's rational soul as an instrument of authority and rule over the slave as a part of nature, and in the preamble to Chapter VIII continues: "Nature intends and provides the requisites for household use [including slaves]; and the acquisition of such requisites is a natural mode of acquisition" (Aristotle 18). Indeed, Aristotle refers to the "art of acquiring property" (19, et passim) as ar
. . .
Where Aristotle refers to the behavior of property "art of acquisition," however, Locke focuses on reason as the basis for discussing how the very concept of private property as a matter of right evolved. Whereas Aristotle's description of different kinds of property leads to an assessment of their relative moral or ethical value, Locke's discussion begins by assigning relative rational or moral weight to concepts of property, and then showing how property ought to be understood: "I shall endeavour to shew, how men might come to have a property in several parts of that which God gave to mankind in common, and that without any express compact of all the commoners" (Locke 18).
Locke's view of human reason, sanctioned by biblical revelation from Psalms that God "has given the earth to the children of men" (18), is the basis for the impulse toward acquiring goods. The impulse toward survival is held in common by all rational beings; accordingly, all such beings have a right to acquire from the common property that which will help them survive. This idea can be compared to Aristotle's view of subsistence-centered property relative to serving basic human needs.
But Locke takes reason further, noting that the same God who gave human be
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Indeed Aristotle, Aristotle Locke, Elsewhere Locke, Psalms God, Treatise Government, XI Aristotle, Whereas Aristotle's, Treatise Whatsoever, Barker Aristotle's, Chapter VIII, property acquisition, private property, art acquisition, aristotle refers, household management, locke's view, subsistence-centered property, exchange property, locke's discussion, value property, idea money-based exchange, politics aristotle aristotle, locke's discussion property, york oxford 1958, form art acquisition,
Approximate Word count = 2718
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
|