Hard Cases & the Judicial System

One of the first "hard" cases which the American judicial system ever faced is the infamous case of Riggs v. Palmer. On August 13, 1880, widower Francis B. Palmer made his last will and testament, giving small legacies to his two daughters and the bulk of his estate to Elmer E. Palmer, Francis' grandson. Elmer's legacy was conditioned on his continued support of Francis' mother, Susan Palmer. However, in March of 1882, Francis married Mrs. Bresee. Elmer knew of the provisions in the will which favored him and was fearful that Francis would eventually revoke these provisions in favor of his new wife. In order to prevent such an eventuality, Elmer poisoned his grandfather. Francis' two daughters contested the will, arguing that Elmer should not be allowed to receive his legacy, having murdered Francis to gain it.

The Court of Appeals of New York held that Elmer should not be allowed to receive his legacy under the will. The court noted that, under the letter of the law, Elmer was entitled to his

. . .
he judge is not tempted by policy considerations which might cause him or her to distribute benefits unequally from one decision to the next. Dworkin's article also examined how a philosophical judge might, in appropriate cases, apply legal principles to resolve hard civil cases. Dworkin says a fair and philosophical judge should limit the gravitational force of previous case decisions to the main principles which justify those decisions. Dworkin reasoned that, if an earlier case decision was based entirely on an application of a particular policy, then that case's decision would have little gravitational weight and thus would not be useful in helping to decide subsequent cases. Dworkin also used the argument espoused by Professor Hart which says that hard cases arise because legal rules often have an "open texture." Another important issue which Dworkin's article focused on was the situation which occurred when a judge had to decide a case in an area without settled theory of law. Dworkin suggests that judges should begin their analysis by asking themselves what principles are relevant to this case which are implicit in the settled law. However, critics of Dworkin's approach argue that the adoption of this approach wou
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Spartan Steel, Professor Hart, Civil War, Ronald Dworkin, Studies Dworkin, , Constitutional Convention, Appeals York, Dworkin American, Bresee Elmer, settled law, principle policy, dworkin's theory, generated principle policy, generated principle, legal rules, dworkin's article, spartan steel, hard hard, legal positivism, legal principles, american judicial system, existing policies formulate, solely existing policies, policies formulate decisions,
Approximate Word count = 2095
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Hard Cases & the Judicial System