The Persian Wars of 512 and 479 B.C.
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The Persian Wars, fought between 512 and 479 B.C., represent the most westward expansion attempt by the great Middle Eastern civilizations prior to the Islamic era. During the course of these several wars, forces of the "Asiatic" Persian Empire made incursions into peninsular Greece, attempting an enforced subjugation of the "European" city-states long-established there. Technically, these were very separate affairs, having different motivations for each and a change of Persian monarchs in mid-stream. The underlying conflict remained unchanged: a clash of civilizations, each seeking dominance over the same domain of the Levantine Mediterranean coast. That the Persians far outnumbered the Greeks does not change the root cause. That the overpowering Persians should fail in each attempt is a matter for interest. It will be the concern of this study to overview the Persian Wars and analyze the factors that led to the failure of the Persian adventure.Persian failure was not an inevitable conclusion. At the time of the first incursions into the Greek mainland, the vitality of the Persian warrior-king Cyrus the Great (ruled 549-530 B.C.) had pushed the empire he was building to the edge of the Bosporus Straits separating mainland Greece from the Ionian Greek colonies founded centuries earlier. Ionian Greeks, like their mainland cousins, were a divisive lot, given to forming-fighting-and-reforming themselves into alliances of independent, competitive city-states. Cyrus' c
. . .
ve horses for cavalry) were required to serve as hoplites. Urged on by Themistocles, even when he was not in power, Athens' citizenry was prepared.
Guided by Hippias, the Persians landed at the plain of Marathon on the easiest road to Athens. The Athenians prepared by taking up a position in a narrow valley, Vrana, facing the Persians on the shore. The Spartans, as noted, could not depart their city in time to be there for this battle, but the Athenians did know that reinforcements were on the road.
The Battle of Marathon was a decisive victory for the Greeks, but how so was more dependent upon the differing fighting styles and a piece of unintended luck than on a particular attribute of either sides' strategy. The Greek hoplites, as described, were particularly adept at close-in fighting. The Persians, by contrast, were spoiled by their numbers: the army of levied subject peoples was generally given to simply overwhelming its opponents, first with showers of arrows, then with cavalry, then with masses of infantry - none of which were particularly well-trained. Given a wide plain and room to maneuver, the Persian Army could have surrounded and swallowed whole the Athenians. Their chosen terrain at Marathon, however, wa
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ionian Greeks, Xerxes Greek, Persian Empire, Battle Marathon, Plutarch Xerxes, Persian Army, Thermopylae Xerxes, Greece Themistocles, Athens Themistocles', Athens Sparta, ionian greeks, greek alliance, persian wars, persian army, peninsular greece, greek ships, greek army, persian front, athens eritria, persian fleet,
Approximate Word count = 3520
Approximate Pages = 14 (250 words per page)
|