The Solomon Amendment

A decision recently handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia found that educational institutions have a First Amendment right to bar military recruiters from their campuses to protest the Defense Department policy of excluding gays from the military (Liptak, 2004). The constitutional law at issue in the decision was the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech; also at issue is the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment of 1995, which bars the federal government from dispersing money to colleges and universities that obstruct campus recruiting by the military (Liptak, 2004).

The Supreme Court should refer to the First Amendment in rejecting the lower courtÆs decision on the basis that refusing to permit military recruiters to speak on campus amounts to a denial of recruitersÆ own right to free speech. Law schools can allow military recruiters to recruit on campus while simultaneously disavowing support for their political ideology or position. Rights are not limited to single actors alone. In the second half of the twentie

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, Alan Brinkley, Liberties Union, Whitlach Bernabei, Solomon Amendment, Response Relevant, Heller Ehrman, White House, Court Appeals, Defense Department, military recruiters, supreme court, law schools, solomon amendment, civil liberties, liptak 2004, american civil liberties, free speech, heller ehrman, november 30, solomon response relevant, ehrman 2004, permit military recruiters, military liptak 2004, heller ehrman 2004,
Approximate Word count = 770
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)

More Essays on The Solomon Amendment