Gender Traits & Stereotyping
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The idea has been advanced by Basow (2000) that it is misleading to engage in an all-or-none categorizing of gender traits. Most males and females experience or manifest traits that are stereotypically attributed to one gender. It is often argued that while males on the average are more aggressive than females on the average, females tend to be more nurturing, caring, and empathetic than males. However, as Basow (2000) has pointed out, there are three qualifications which should be understood as negating gender stereotypes: 1. People cannot be viewed as collections of consistent traits because situations influence how individuals develop, act, and think. 2. Males and females cannot be viewed as having uniquely oppositional traits. 3. When an attribute is thought of as distinctly masculine or feminine, it is likely that the opposite gender or some portion thereof These considerations are well borne out in an analysis of the life of one of AmericaÆs most famous public figures, Eleanor Roosevelt. Roosevelt (1961, p. xvi) states that every individual as he or she progresses through life, ôhas different problems and reacts differently to the same circumstances.ö It is her view that while there may be feminine and masculine characteristics, much of what becomes a personÆs affective style or presentation of self, emerges from the circumstances of their lives. Eleanor Roosevelt in 1884 into the upper echelons of establ
. . .
ce in shaping the life of Eleanor Roosevelt and each member of the family.
As Fine and Asch (2000) have noted, functional impairment presents real challenges not only to those who are disabled, but also to those who care for them or are members of their families. Given that Franklin Roosevelt refused to permit his disability to stand in the way of his political ambitions, the primary impact of this disability was to shift certain political responsibilities from Franklin to Eleanor Roosevelt. The assumptions advanced by Fine and Asch (2000) regarding the effects of disability such as disability being synonymous with needing help or social support and the centrality of disability to the disabled personÆs self-concept do not appear to apply in the case of the Roosevelts.
Eleanor Roosevelt (1961) does admit that Franklin Roosevelt was often frustrated by his physical frailties and that this frustration had a negative impact upon their marriage. Nevertheless, she also makes it clear that Franklin did not allow his disability to prevent him from presenting himself as a viable candidate for the nationÆs highest office. Eleanor Roosevelt became a complicitor in Franklin RooseveltÆs determination to minimize the effects of his d
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Eleanor Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, , Franklin RooseveltÆs, Eleanor RooseveltÆs, Richard Kahlenberg, Hyde Park, Secretary Navy, Fine Asch, eleanor roosevelt, Roosevelt Roosevelt, roosevelt 1961, franklin roosevelt, difference boston, boston mcgraw-hill, franklin rooseveltÆs, meaning difference boston, difference boston mcgraw-hill, meaning difference, travis eds meaning, ke rosenblum tc, ke rosenblum, rosenblum tc, eds meaning, tc travis eds,
Approximate Word count = 2633
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Gender Traits & Stereotyping
|