West Coast Hotel v. Parrish

The purpose of this research is to examine the Supreme Court decision in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, 107 U.S. 3141 (1937) as an important Constitutional case. The plan of the research will be to set forth the type of action and the political and historical context in which the case arose, and then to discuss the process and rationale by which the Supreme Court came to decide the case as it did.

West Coast Hotel v. Parrish was important for several reasons. First, it truncated by rendering superfluous Franklin Delano Roosevelt's attempt to "pack" the Supreme Court with justices who, as he thought, would be more congenial to his radical restructuring of the federal government under the New Deal. Second, and related to the first reason, it marked a discernible political shift on the Court itself, from one that, where the swing vote on majority opinions were concerned, was programmatically hostile to the legal theoretical underpinnings of the New Deal, to one that exhibited much legal and Constitutional tolerance toward the overt federal sponsorship of welfare, opportunity, and caretaker programs that had in earlier periods of American history been sponsored by the private sector. Third, and perhaps more important for the long term, it declared new policy in the realm of government jurisdiction over certain salient aspects of private-sector activity.

On its face, West Coast Hotel v. Parrish was a minimum-wage case. At the time the case began, the guarantee of a minimum

Related Essays

Evolution of Substantive Due Process .... selected shall have a real and substantial relation to the object sought to be obtained." In this decision and West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish three years later .... (3480 14 )

1937 Court Packing Episode FDR, the Supreme Cour .... to an end soon after he made his proposal. West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937) ... because it was decided only seven weeks after .... (1815 7 )

FDR's Attempt at Court Packing FDR, the Supreme Cour .... to an end soon after he made his proposal. West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937) ... because it was decided only seven weeks after .... (1815 7 )

HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE DUE PROCESS .... In West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 US 379 (1937), Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes for a 5-4 majority upheld the constitutionality of a Washington .... (4778 19 )

US Supreme Court-Packing .... One of the important verities in politics is that few if any political triumphs are permanent. West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937) ... .... (2604 10 )

review attitude that basically made it impossible for the executive and legislative branches to govern in a way that would deliberately seek to alter the economic, social, and political status quo. Leuchtenburg explains this environment in terms of a confrontation between executive and judicial branches of government. Roosevelt's Second Inaugural Address on January 20, 1937, indicated he was ready for a more radical turn. "I see onethird of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished," the President declared. For the next two weeks, the country waited to see what specific legislation the President would demand to improve the lot of this "one-third of a nation." When Roosevelt did act, he caught the country by surprise. In a message which electrified the nation, he asked not for new social legislation but for reform of the Supreme Court. In the spring of 1936, the Court, which had already wiped out the NRA and the AAA, had gone out of its way to find the Guffey Coal Conservation Act unconstitutional. A month later, in the Morehead Case, the Court shocked even conservatives by ruling, once more by a 5-4 vote, that a New York state minimum wage law was invalid. In the field of labor relations, the Court seemed to have cre

Category: Government - W