The Cambodia Bombing

 
 
 
 
On February 19, 1969, not long after Richard Nixon became President, the military command in Vietnam requested permission to commence a secret program of bombing operations within the borders of neighboring Cambodia (Shawcross, 1979, pp. 19ff). Naturally, this "secret" campaign was in no way secret from the people among whom the bombs were falling. It was "secret" only in two contexts; first, of "plausible deniability" in international diplomacy, and second  probably a more important consideration  of secrecy from Congressional and other opponents of the war within the United States.

The bombing of Cambodia is of broad significance in several respects. First, and most narrowly, it was an escalation of the Vietnam war, of questionable legality, in bombing the territory of a neutral nation with which the U.S. was not at war, and had no mutual security arrangements that would permit such bombing. Second, it represented the characteristic features of U.S. military policy in Vietnam, in being an application of bombing over jungle terrain in which such measures were of questionable effectiveness. Third, it added fuel to the domestic fire of angry "debate" over the conduct and morality of the Vietnam War; the failure of the bombing campaign to achieve its desired results led directly to the ground "incursion" into Cambodia, in May of 1969. This incursion in turn led immediately to the Kent State killings of four college students (not all involved in antiwar protests; on


     
 
 
 
    

 

Related Essays

US Role in the Vietnam War This resear .... Vietnamization, the phased withdrawal of American forces, periodic escalations such as the secret bombing of Cambodia, the brief ARVN incursion into Cambodia .... (3310 13 )

The Moment of Birth and Its Consequences .... 15 by the end of the US bombing of Cambodia. The end of the bombing campaign marked the official end of a dozen years of bloody conflict in Southeast Asia. .... (1535 6 )

Presidential War Powers .... troops. The first congressional victory was a bill barring any combat in, or bombing of, Cambodia after August 15, 1973. That same .... (1756 7 )

Presidential usurpations of military power .... troops. The first congressional victory was a bill barring any combat in, or bombing of, Cambodia after August 15, 1973. That same .... (1599 6 )

The Khmer Roug t .... spreading further into Southeast Asia.7 The CIA's involvement in Cambodia went back .... principally due to the US failure in Vietnam, the Cambodian bombing by the .... (2158 9 )



eyeball"  simply cannot see through the triple canopy to identify and aim at targets on the ground. Further exacerbating the problem was the nature of the enemy, in two vital respects. While the Iraqi army in Kuwait was by no means a "hightech" force, it was unquestionably a motorized, conventional Westernstyle army. Motor pools, supply and gasoline dumps, gasoline storage sites, all were concentrated targets well suited to air strikes. Moreover, it was relatively easy to judge the effects of air strikes on such targets (though U.S. planners, with bitter Vietnam experience behind them, tended to consistently underestimate damage done). North Vietnamese and Vietcong forces operating in eastern Cambodia shared none of these "airfriendly" characteristics. For the most part, logistic support was either localized  troops "living off the land," supported willingly or under compulsion by local populations  or was provided mainly by human beings acting as porters. There were thus relatively few if any of the sorts of physical concentrations of materiel which could be identified by intelligence, targeted for strikes, and then evaluated for level of damage by poststrike reconnaissance. As a result, to a fantastically gr

Category: History - T
 
 
 
Common Topics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click Here to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 
 
 
Join Now  
 
 
 
 
 
Saved Papers  
 
 
Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!
 
 
 
Testimonials  
 
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
Debbie B.
 
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
Mike F.
 
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
Carla T.
 
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
Nate A.
 
"I love this site!!!"
Marie H.
 
 
 
 
Copyright © 2007 - 2012 Lots of Essays. All Rights Reserved. DMCA