Shared Decision Making in Schools
Introduction
Chion-Kenney and Hymes
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Chion-Kenney and Hymes (1994) have defined shared decision-making in terms of several characteristics. In this regard, the authors state that shared decision-making involves: (1) a new mindset about authority and responsibility in schools in which the power to make decisions about the school are no longer relegated simply to the top management but rather shared with faculty and sometimes even staff; (2) the negotiation of certain trends and issues as they apply to specific school settings and situations; and (3) variety in approach with no one model being the best way. The authors also point out that there are several important criteria for determining when a school is ready for shared decision-making. These criteria include: commitment, attitude, purpose, action, leadership, readiness, character, and steadfastness. The importance of teacher involvement in shared decision-making cannot be overestimated. In this regard, Jones (1995) has noted that existing occupational research has shown that employees who participate in decisions exhibit higher job morale; moreover, such participation tends to make an organization more effective. In his study, Jones (1995) examined shared decision-making in relation to job morale and student achievement through the use of a survey-correlational design. Three instruments were utilized. The Teacher Decision-Making Instrument was used to measure actual and desired participation methods. The Purdue Teacher Opinion
. . .
participate in the research project. A five point Likert scale survey was used to solicit information from teachers.
Statistical analysis revealed the following:
(1) Teachers perceived themselves as being more effective when participating in shared decision-making. A p-value of less than 0.01 was obtained using a Pearson-r correlation indicating a significant relationship between teachers' perceived effectiveness and their involvement in shared decision-making. (2) Teachers' age influenced their desire to be involved in shared decision-making (Teachers under 30 and over 41 tended to be more involved than teachers of other ages). A probability of 0.02 was obtained using an Analysis of Variance indicating a relationship between age and desired involvement in shared decision-making.
(3) Teacher gender did not influence their desire to be involved in shared decision-making.
Based on findings, several conclusions were formulated. First, it was concluded that teachers tend to be more effective when participating in shared decision-making. It was also concluded that teachers tend to desire more involvement in shared decision-making.
In addition, findings were said to imply that administrators were not sufficiently m
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
According Jones, Public Act, According Mayo, Academic Skills, Chion-Kenney Hymes, Shared Decision-Making, Analysis Variance, shared decision-making, Professional Experience, Purpose Study, Abstracts International, involvement shared, involvement shared decision-making, teacher involvement, teacher involvement shared, professional experience, shared decision-making process, degree expected, decision-making process, site-based management, involved shared, involved shared decision-making, administrators teachers, personal characteristics, reproduction service ed,
Approximate Word count = 2339
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
|