Views of Public Policy

A regulatory regime is a historically specific configuration of policies and institutions which establishes certain broad goals that transcend the problems specific to particular industries. Institutions, because they provide interest groups with access to the making and implementation of policy, play a central role in structuring regulatory politics and the relationship between societal interests, the state, and economic access. . . (Eisner xv-xvi).

Eisner says that the use of a regime framework makes it possible for him to explore a wide range of policies and regulatory agencies throughout several historical periods. Eisner recognizes the regulatory complexities involved and notes some of the problems that can develop because of it:

Regulatory complexity can impede active participation in the political process. Thus, recent decades have seen a series of administrative reforms designed to force agency action and promote greater opportunities for group participation (Eisner xvi).

Eisner states that regimes are political-institutional arrangements defining the relationship between social interests, the state, and economic actors such as corporations, labor unions, and agricultural associations (Eisner 2). Regime analysis is valuable precisely because it is so inclusive, examining the different social actors and actor-inter

. . .
of regulation can also enable those forming policy to avoid mistakes of the past and to bring different elements together in a more effective manner than might take place "by accident," as it were. A historical focus can reveal the strengths and the limitations of contemporary regulation and of how regulation is portrayed, which may be quite different from the reality. Eisner emphasizes the combination of the economic, political, and intellectual forces that shape major policy initiatives, and his approach makes this combination more comprehensible. Work Cited Eisner, Marc Allen. Regulatory Politics in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993. The prescriptions of Kenneth J. Meier reflect a close analysis of public policy regarding certain human behaviors designated as "sins" in many religious doctrines but also in the social policies adopted to curb or reduce them, such as the use of drugs and alcohol. Drugs and alcohol are similar in that they cause health problems and contribute to the incidence of crime, accidents, a reduction in business productivity, and similar social concerns, but they are considered different in that alcohol is legal and hard drugs are not. There was an attempt, of cours
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Kenneth Meier, , rational drug, drug policy, rational drug policy, University Press, change policy, drugs alcohol, war drugs, policy initiatives, York Sharpe, implementation policy, regulatory politics, drugs change policy, drugs change, regime framework,
Approximate Word count = 1428
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Views of Public Policy