Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Deregulation of Public Utilities in California

This is an excerpt from the paper...

California often serves as a model for the nation in matters of government policy, and its experience in deregulating public utilities is no exception. California, which boasts the world's seventh largest economy, is currently attempting to privatize its electricity industry. In 1994, the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) released a plan to deregulate electric utilities in much the same way that it had deregulated natural gas and telecommunications during the past decade. This concept, known as retail wheeling, has met with opposition from many economists because of the natural monopoly characteristics of the electricity industry.

California's electricity rates are about 50 percent higher than the national average. When the PUC deregulated long-distance telephone calling during the 1980s, rates dropped over 60 percent. Natural gas deregulation during the 1980s brought savings of over $80 billion dollars to consumers (Parrish, 1994, p. A16). The PUC's goal in making the electricity industry more competitive is to cut costs and improve delivery of service: "Rather than continue micro-managing utility companies' business decisions--and risk dictating bad policy--the five members of the PUC prefer to let the marketplace have its way with the states power and telecommunciations industries" (p. A16).

The PUC's current regulatory environment is based on the troubled economic conditions that existed during the period between 1966-1981. This period was plague

. . .
erized by both. In 1990, American utilities spent over $2 billion on DSM programs. Among the most ambitious utilities are the New England Electric System (NEES), Boston Edison Company, and various California utilities (Cicchetti and Sepetys, 1995, p. 42). The NEES effort, entitled "Partners In Energy Planning," is a five-year program initiated in 1987 with a goal of saving 300 MWs. The goal for the first five years of Boston Edison's program is a savings of 117 MWs and 1,167 gigawatt-hours. California's program calls for the expenditure of $560 million in energy efficiency R&D over a two-year period (p. 42). California also seeks to remove its public utilities from the new generation business. A step in that direction is the California PUC's efforts to privatize the electricity industry, a move which has generated substantial opposition. Some economists maintain that public utilities constitute natural monopolies and that privatization is impractical. In general, the rationale for public utilities as regulated monopolies rests on the importance of these industries in the economic infrastructure. The size and growth of local and national economies depend on public utilities and vice versa: "As general economic growth p
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Lesser Ainspan, Oil Embargo, California PUC, California PUC's, Cicchetti Sepetys, Rasmussen Undated, Supreme Court, Commission PUC, A16 PUC's, DSM DSM, retail wheeling, public utilities, electricity industry, cicchetti sepetys, sepetys 1995, cicchetti sepetys 1995, lesser ainspan, lesser ainspan 1994, economic efficiency, ainspan 1994, energy conservation, energy efficiency, arab oil embargo, proponents retail wheeling, energy conservation efforts,
Approximate Word count = 3284
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$