Classical theory in criminology
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Classical theory in criminology has its roots in the theories of the 18th century Italian nobleman and economist, Cesare Beccaria and the English philosopher, Jeremy Bentham (Hollin, 2004, 2). This was a time in history when punishment for crime was severe in the extreme, and both men proffered the theory of utility. New theorists like Beccaria and Bentham looked at the causes of criminal and delinquent behavior, and began to scientifically explain such deviance (Juvenile, 2005, 71). They rejected theories of naturalism and demonology which characterized the European Enlightenment as explanations for these types of behavior. The new theories reflected the rationalism and humanitarianism of the philosophy of the Age of Enlightenment Beccaria did not develop a completely new theory of criminology, but rather sought a way to make the punishment for committing a crime more rational (Classic, 2001). He believed that there should be a hierarchy of punishments for more and more serious crimes and the number of times a criminal had been charged previously, The circumstances under which the death penalty was imposed would depend entirely on the severity of the crime and not the actual act committed or the degree of involvement in the act. He was against judges having the broad discretion they possessed and favored definite punishments fitting each crime. He published an historic piece, An Essay on Crimes and Punishment, in 1764, discussing why crime occurs and what society
. . .
he same harsh penalties, then there is no differential effect of punishment, and if a criminal has committed a lesser crime, he may as well go on and commit a greater one because the penalty will be the same if he is caught.
If the punishment is increasingly harsher as the level of the crime increases, so that the cost of the crime always outweighs the benefits, then punishment can act as a deterrent (Hollin, 2004, 2; Juvenile, 2005, 71-72).
The two basic tenets of classical theory are that individuals exhibit free will when they choose to engage in criminal behavior, and that they act in a rational manner when making these choices (Hollin, 2004, 3). The principle of mens rea, guilty intent, is the modern equivalent of free will which forms the basis of the legal systems of both the United States and Europe today. The courts dispense punishments dependent on the severity of the crime committed, which is utilitarian theory, and is intended to deter crime.
The principles on which classical theory is based are:
Humans are fundamentally rational and enjoy free will. Crime is an outcome of rationality and free will. People
choose to engage in criminal rather than conformist behavior
Criminality is morally w
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
French Code, United Europe, Beccaria Bentham, Bentham Beccaria, Enlightenment Beccaria, Crimes Punishment, Retrieved Nov, Bentham Hollin, , classical theory, European Enlightenment, hollin 2004, juvenile 2005, hollin 2004 2, 2004 2, theory criminology, committing crime, neoclassical theory, severity crime, retrieved nov, prevent crime, punishment committing crime, juvenile 2005 71, classical theory neoclassical, theory neoclassical theory,
Approximate Word count = 1442
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Classical theory in criminology
|