This paper will examine Gorniak's contention that a new computer ethic is necessary because of the global nature of computer technology is correct but may, by his own definition, be impossible to enforce (Gorniak). Computers know no boundaries and their proliferation worldwide has made computer technology available to a vast array of cultures, mores, lores, values, opinions, dogmas, religions, and ethical standards. The world, though globalized in many aspects through computerization and communication technology, is still composed of different racial groups, different cultural norms and standards, different belief systems, different religions, and people from vastly different political persuasions. To impose one computer ethic on such a diverse computer community is a monumental task, and enforcement virtually impossible with today's technology.
I do not believe that Postman's Techno-Skepticism can survive in the technological age of today, never mind what is to come in the future (Postman). Certainly, it would enrich mankind if some of the energy now focused on computer technology and mastering the skills of its potentials were diverted to the arts, literature, education, philosophy, and theology, but those with a strong drive in these areas still pursue them, only now they have the assistance of the computer to do the tedious parts of their jobs and leave them free to use their creative talents in the directions of their choice. To dismiss the contributions of the computer and all that can be gained from it outright and suggest that it should be diverted to these other pursuits is unrealistic. Times change, and those who cannot change with them will be left behind, left out of the advantages that change can give them.
It is true that not all change is for the good, but Postman should give us some credit for common sense and reason. Surely there are those among us who can recognize the good and the evil and choose bet...